Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Comorbidities, healthcare resource utilization & treatment pattern among patients with prurigo nodularis, compared to
Sonja Ständer1, Miriam Ketz2, Divine Akumo3
1Department of Dermatology, Center for Chronic Pruritus, University Hospital of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Background:
Prurigo nodularis (PN) is a rare chronic inflammatory skin disease with a high disease burden, but data on clinical and economic burden are still scarce.
Objective:
To describe the real-world epidemiologic, clinical and therapeutic characteristics and related economic burden of patients with PN compared to a benchmark population in Germany.
Methods:
This retrospective study was based on an excerpt of German Statutory Health Insurance data of patients with an initial PN diagnosis between 2012 and 2016. PN cohort contained no record of PN in eight quarters before the index quarter and was followed up for eight quarters (unless deceased). Benchmark cohort without PN was calculated using direct standardization and 1:1 matching to PN cohort.
Results:
Out of 4,536,002 insured patients, 2309 incident patients with PN were identified and matched to the benchmark cohort out of 3,018,382 patients without PN. Patients were mostly between 45 and 80 years when diagnosed with PN. Higher comorbidity rates were reported for PN than benchmark, with a rising disease burden at follow-up. Most patients with PN (91.3%) were diagnosed outpatient and had >50% more outpatient visits than the benchmark cohort. Hospitalization rates were higher in PN (53.9%) versus benchmark (35.1%), yielding twice longer mean hospital stays for PN (12 days) compared to benchmark (6 days) (p < 0.001). The most common initial therapy for patients with PN was topical corticosteroids (47.6%); ≥10% of patients were treated with antidepressants, antihistamines or systemic corticosteroids. Therapy rates were higher for PN compared to benchmark (p < 0.001). Mean initial costs were twofold higher in PN versus benchmark for outpatient, inpatient and drugs. During follow-up, an increase of >70% in mean PN costs compared to benchmark was identified for outpatient, inpatient and concomitant treatments (p < 0.001).
Conclusion:
This study highlights the significantly higher clinical and economic burden incurred by PN compared to benchmark patients in Germany, reflecting the unmet medical need for PN.
Related Concept Videos
Skin Cancer
Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC): BCC is the most common type of skin cancer, accounting for about 80% of cases. It typically develops in...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...

