Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2025

07:03
Medical-grade Sterilizable Target for Fluid-immersed Fetoscope Optical Distortion Calibration
Published on: February 23, 2017
7.7K
Unsupervised Detection and Correction of Model Calibration Shift at Test-Time
Summary
A new method (CaDC) detects and corrects model calibration shift using unlabeled data. This improves the generalizability and performance of clinical predictive models, like those for sepsis prediction, across different hospitals.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Informatics
- Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Predictive Modeling
Background:
- Clinical predictive models require generalizability and consistent performance over time.
- Model calibration shift, due to changing data distributions or prevalence, hinders model generalizability.
- Maintaining model performance across diverse healthcare systems is crucial for widespread adoption.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose a novel method for detecting and correcting model calibration shift.
- To develop a flexible approach (CaDC) usable with any deep learning clinical model.
- To validate the method's effectiveness in improving sepsis prediction models.
Main Methods:
- Developed a model calibration detection and correction (CaDC) method.
- Utilized unlabeled data from target hospitals for calibration shift correction.
- Applied CaDC to a sepsis prediction model using three large US patient cohorts (545,089 patients).
Main Results:
- The CaDC method successfully detected and corrected calibration shift in sepsis prediction models.
- Models using CaDC achieved predefined positive predictive values (PPV) more effectively.
- For a target PPV of 20%, CaDC improved performance from 18.0% to 23.1% in external validation cohorts.
Conclusions:
- The CaDC method enhances the generalizability and reliability of clinical predictive models.
- This approach can maintain performance claims for models deployed across multiple hospital systems.
- CaDC offers a practical solution for addressing calibration drift in real-world clinical settings.
Related Concept Videos
Distance Corrections
28
To achieve precise distance measurements, especially in surveying and construction, certain corrections must be applied to account for potential sources of error like the standardization errors, temperature variations, and slope adjustments.Standardization error emerges when measurement equipment undergoes changes, such as wear, repairs, or weather impacts. To address this, surveyors compare the equipment’s readings to a standard. This process identifies any deviation that might lead to...
28
Instrument Calibration
194
Instrument calibration is essential for ensuring that instruments produce accurate and consistent results. It is vital in manufacturing, healthcare, testing laboratories, and scientific research. Calibration processes are specific to each instrument and help enhance data accuracy. Each instrument has a unique calibration process tailored to its design and function to improve data accuracy.
Analytical Balance Calibration
An analytical balance measures mass and requires regular calibration to...
Analytical Balance Calibration
An analytical balance measures mass and requires regular calibration to...
194
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors
75
A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
75
Random and Systematic Errors
11.0K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
11.0K
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation
2.5K
A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
2.5K
Errors in Taping
27
Errors in taping arise from multiple factors that can significantly impact measurement accuracy in surveying. Misalignment of the tape, often due to human error, is one primary source. A skilled rear tapeman, using a telescope, can help correct alignment by guiding the head tapeman; however, human limitations still lead to small inaccuracies. These errors may include misplacement of pins or inaccurate tape readings due to common visual confusions, such as mistaking a six for a nine. Such...
27

