Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2025

A Test Bed to Examine Helmet Fit and Retention and Biomechanical Measures of Head and Neck Injury in Simulated Impact
Published on: September 21, 2017
Safety/booster seats in pediatric motor vehicle crashes: Public health concern
Jeffrey Santos1, Areg Grigorian1, Morgan Schellenberg2
1University of California, Irvine, Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma, Burns and Surgical Critical Care, Orange, CA, USA.
Insights
Children under 12 and under 145 cm are recommended safety/booster seats. In high-risk crashes, using these seats significantly reduced serious injuries and surgeries, highlighting a need for better adherence.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric trauma research
- Public health and safety guidelines
- Motor vehicle collision (MVC) injury prevention
Background:
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) guidelines recommend safety/booster seats for children ≤12 years and <145 cm.
- National adherence rates and clinical outcomes for this pediatric population after MVCs are not well-documented.
- Hypothesis: Safety/booster seat use decreases serious injuries in children involved in MVCs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the association between safety/booster seat use and serious injuries in children ≤12 years and <145 cm involved in MVCs.
- To assess adherence to AAP safety/booster seat recommendations in a pediatric trauma population.
- To analyze outcomes in high-risk MVCs based on safety/booster seat usage.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study using the 2017-2019 Trauma Quality Improvement Program database.
- Included patients ≤12 years and <145 cm presenting after an MVC.
- Defined serious injury as Abbreviated Injury Scale grade ≥3; defined high-risk MVCs based on established criteria.
Main Results:
- Overall adherence to safety/booster seat use was 41%.
- No significant difference in overall serious injury or mortality rates between seat users and non-users.
- In high-risk MVCs, safety/booster seat use (56% of cases) was associated with significantly lower rates of serious injury (53.6% vs. 62.1%) and operative intervention (15.8% vs. 21.6%).
Conclusions:
- Less than half of children eligible for safety/booster seats used them in trauma centers after MVCs.
- Pediatric patients in high-risk MVCs without safety/booster seats experienced more severe injuries and required more surgeries.
- Public health initiatives are needed to improve safety/booster seat adherence in this vulnerable pediatric group.
Introduction:
The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) guidelines recommend that children ≤12-years-old with height < 145 cm should use safety/booster seats. However, national adherence and clinical outcomes for eligible children involved in motor vehicle collisions (MVCs) are unknown. We hypothesized that children recommended to use safety/booster seats involved in MVCs have a lower rate of serious injuries if a safety/booster seat is used, compared to children without safety/booster seat.
Methods:
This retrospective cohort study queried the 2017-2019 Trauma Quality Improvement Program database for patients ≤12-years-old and <145 cm (recommendation for use of safety/booster seat per American Academy of Pediatrics) presenting after MVC. Serious injury was defined by abbreviated injury scale grade ≥3 for any body-region. High-risk MVC was defined by authors in conjunction with definitions provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma.
Results:
From 8259 cases, 41% used a safety/booster seat. There was no difference in overall rate of serious traumatic injuries or mortality (both p > 0.05) between the safety/booster seat and no safety/booster seat groups. In a subset analysis of high-risk MVCs, the overall use of safety/booster seats was 56%. The rate of serious traumatic injury (53.6% vs. 62.1%, p = 0.017) and operative intervention (15.8% vs. 21.6%, p = 0.039) was lower in the safety/booster seat group compared to the no safety/booster seat group.
Conclusions:
Despite AAP guidelines, less than half of recommended children in our study population presenting to a trauma center after MVC used safety/booster seats. Pediatric patients involved in a high-risk MVC suffered more serious injuries and were more likely to require surgical intervention without a safety/booster seat. A public health program to increase adherence to safety/booster seat use within this population appears warranted.
Related Concept Videos
Teratogenicity
Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention
In primary prevention, actions taken before disease onset prevent the disease from...
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results...
Preventive Healthcare Services
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention I
The health belief model (HBM) attempts to predict health-related behavior in specific belief patterns. According to the HBM, a person's...
Stimulants
Cocaine can be administered via snorting, injection, or smoking. It primarily functions by blocking the reuptake of dopamine, resulting in a euphoric high characterized by an intense sensation of happiness and...

