Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 24, 2026

Biosensor for Detection of Antibiotic Resistant Staphylococcus Bacteria
Published on: May 8, 2013
Molecular and Clinical Features of Heterogeneous Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus in Tertiary Care
M Sreejisha1, M Shalini Shenoy1, M Suchitra Shenoy1
1Department of Microbiology, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, (A constituent unit of Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal), Karnataka, India.
Objectives:
This study aimed to detect heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (hVISA) among methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolated from healthcare-associated infections and identify staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) types.
Methods:
This study was conducted from February 2019 to March 2020 and included patients admitted in 4 tertiary care hospitals in Karnataka, India. Isolation and identification of MRSA were done using standard bacteriological methods. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was done using Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion; macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B phenotypes were identified using the D test. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of vancomycin was determined using agar dilution. hVISA were confirmed by the modified population analysis profile-area under the curve test. SCCmec types and the Panton-Valentine leukocidin (pvl) gene were detected using multiplex polymerase chain reaction.
Results:
Of 220 MRSA stains, 14 (6.4%) were hVISA. None of the MRSA isolates was vancomycin-intermediate or -resistant and all hVISA were susceptible to linezolid and teicoplanin. The macrolide-streptogramin B phenotype was present in 42.9% of hVISA; 92.9% of the hVISA strains had vancomycin MIC in the range of 1-2 μg/mL. Majority of the hVISA and vancomycin-susceptible MRSA were isolated from patients with skin and soft tissue infections. SCCmec III and IV were present in 50% and 35.7% of hVISA, respectively; 14.3% of the hVISA harboured SCCmec V.
Conclusion:
The prevalence rate of hVISA among MRSA was 6.4%. Therefore, MRSA strains should be tested for hVISA before starting vancomycin treatment. None of the isolates was vancomycin-intermediate or -resistant and all the hVISA strains were susceptible to linezolid and teicoplanin. The majority of the hVISA were isolated from patients with skin and soft tissue infections and harboured SCCmec III and IV.
Insights
A study found 6.4% of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains were heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate (hVISA). Testing for hVISA is crucial before vancomycin treatment, as these strains remain susceptible to linezolid and teicoplanin.
Area of Science:
- Microbiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Clinical Science
Background:
- Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) poses a significant threat in healthcare settings.
- Vancomycin is a critical antibiotic for treating MRSA infections, but resistance is a growing concern.
- Heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (hVISA) strains can lead to vancomycin treatment failure.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the prevalence of hVISA among MRSA isolates from healthcare-associated infections in India.
- To characterize the antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of hVISA isolates.
- To identify the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) types associated with hVISA.
Main Methods:
- MRSA identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing using standard microbiological methods.
- Vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination via agar dilution.
- hVISA confirmation using modified population analysis profile-area under the curve (PAP-AUC) testing.
- SCCmec typing and Panton-Valentine leukocidin (pvl) gene detection by multiplex PCR.
Main Results:
- Out of 220 MRSA isolates, 14 (6.4%) were identified as hVISA.
- All hVISA isolates were susceptible to vancomycin (MIC 1-2 μg/mL), linezolid, and teicoplanin.
- SCCmec types III and IV were most common in hVISA isolates (50% and 35.7%, respectively).
- The macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B phenotype was observed in 42.9% of hVISA strains.
Conclusions:
- The prevalence of hVISA among MRSA in this cohort was 6.4%.
- Routine screening for hVISA in MRSA isolates is recommended prior to vancomycin therapy.
- hVISA strains identified in this study maintained susceptibility to vancomycin, linezolid, and teicoplanin.
- Skin and soft tissue infections were the most common source of hVISA isolates, frequently associated with SCCmec types III and IV.
More Related Videos
09:03Multiplex PCR Assay for Typing of Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome Mec Types I to V in Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Published on: September 5, 2013
08:51Atomic Force Microscopy Combined with Infrared Spectroscopy as a Tool to Probe Single Bacterium Chemistry
Published on: September 15, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Sputum Studies I: Gram Stain, cytology, and Acid-fast smear and culture
Gram Stain
The Gram Stain is an integral part of sputum studies. It involves the staining of sputum, which permits...
Differential Staining Technique
Special Staining Techniques
Staphylococcal Skin Infections
Candidiasis
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance