Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Level and Nature of Impairment on the Iowa Gambling Task Following Acquired Brain Injury: A Meta-analysis.

Neuropsychology review·2025
Same author

Co-rumination and intrapersonal cognitive processes predict distress: Longitudinal evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress·2024
Same author

Examining Food-Specific and General Inhibitory Control and Working Memory as Moderators of Relations Between Emotion Regulation Difficulties and Eating Pathology in Adults With Overweight/Obesity: A Preregistered, Cross-Sectional Study.

Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists·2024
Same author

Academic self-handicapping as a mediator of the relation between imposterism and academic goal orientation: testing invariance by gender and underrepresented status.

Journal of American college health : J of ACH·2024
Same author

Ecological validity of common behavioral decision making tasks: evidence across two samples.

Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology·2024
Same author

One-size fits all? Evaluating group differences in an integrated social cognition model to understand COVID-19 vaccine intention and uptake.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 27, 2026

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.0K

Test-Retest Reliability of Common Behavioral Decision-Making Tasks: A Multi-Sample, Repeated Measures Study.

Melissa T Buelow1, Jennifer M Kowalsky1, Bradley M Okdie1

  • 1Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Newark, OH 43055, USA.

Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology : the Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists
|December 13, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Behavioral decision-making tasks show limited test-retest reliability over 10 weeks. This finding questions their use for tracking changes in decision-making, especially in clinical populations.

Keywords:
Decision-makingExecutive functionRepeated measuresTest reliabilityTest–retest reliability

More Related Videos

A Behavioral Test Battery for the Repeated Assessment of Motor Skills, Mood, and Cognition in Mice
07:18

A Behavioral Test Battery for the Repeated Assessment of Motor Skills, Mood, and Cognition in Mice

Published on: March 2, 2019

19.1K
Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats
09:12

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats

Published on: March 17, 2019

9.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 27, 2026

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.0K
A Behavioral Test Battery for the Repeated Assessment of Motor Skills, Mood, and Cognition in Mice
07:18

A Behavioral Test Battery for the Repeated Assessment of Motor Skills, Mood, and Cognition in Mice

Published on: March 2, 2019

19.1K
Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats
09:12

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats

Published on: March 17, 2019

9.5K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • Decision-making is crucial to human behavior, with decision science exploring its psychological processes and outcomes.
  • Reliable measurement is essential for understanding psychological processes, yet test-retest reliability of decision-making tasks is understudied.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the test-retest reliability of common behavioral decision-making tasks.
  • To determine the utility of these tasks for longitudinal studies and clinical assessments.

Main Methods:

  • Examined the reliability of behavioral decision-making tasks across time.
  • Utilized two samples and two assessment time points over a 10-week interval.

Main Results:

  • Behavioral decision-making tasks demonstrated, at best, moderate test-retest reliability over a 10-week period.
  • No tasks assessed showed strong evidence of reliability across the interval.

Conclusions:

  • Findings challenge the reliability of current behavioral decision-making tasks for tracking changes over time.
  • The utility of these tasks for monitoring decision-making in clinical populations is questionable.