Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Group Polarization01:01

Group Polarization

34.3K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
34.3K
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

14.7K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.7K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention I01:25

Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention I

2.0K
A model is a theoretical way to understand a concept or an idea. Models can overcome barriers to health regardless of diverse economic and cultural backgrounds. In addition, models make the task easier by providing different ways to approach complex issues. There are two major health promotion models: the health belief model and the health promotion model.
The health belief model (HBM) attempts to predict health-related behavior in specific belief patterns. According to the HBM, a person's...
2.0K
Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

40.0K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
40.0K
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

23.0K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
23.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Large language models accurately identify decision reasons in verbal reports.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Toward a mechanistic understanding of false news sharing: Which interventions work best, for whom, and why.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same author

The differential consequences of correcting misinformation for high and low credibility sources.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Corrections outperform expertise-based interventions for countering misinformation from alternative medicine sources.

Applied psychology. Health and well-being·2026
Same author

Communicating risks more comprehensively using simulated experience.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same author

Disentangling participation in online political discussions with a collective field experiment.

Science advances·2025
Same journal

Collective memory and historical thinking in times of uncertainty.

Current opinion in psychology·2026
Same journal

Does behavioral parent training benefit from cultural adaptations? A critical analysis.

Current opinion in psychology·2026
Same journal

Politics in psychiatry and psychotherapis in Japan with personal reflection; Is cognitive behavior therapy non-political?

Current opinion in psychology·2026
Same journal

Antisemitism in professional clinical psychology training.

Current opinion in psychology·2026
Same journal

The decolonization of museums.

Current opinion in psychology·2026
Same journal

Contemporary antisemitism: Implications for cognitive behavioral therapy.

Current opinion in psychology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 8, 2025

Measuring Engagement of Spectators of Social Digital Games
14:02

Measuring Engagement of Spectators of Social Digital Games

Published on: July 3, 2021

3.5K

The Online Misinformation Engagement Framework.

Michael Geers1, Briony Swire-Thompson2, Philipp Lorenz-Spreen3

  • 1Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Lentzeallee 94, 14195 Berlin, Germany; Department of Psychology, Humboldt University of Berlin, Rudower Ch. 18, 12489 Berlin, Germany.

Current Opinion in Psychology
|December 13, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces the Online Misinformation Engagement Framework to organize research on online misinformation. It highlights early stages of source and information selection as key areas for intervention to combat misinformation.

Keywords:
EngagementInterventionsMisinformationOnline environmentsSocial media

More Related Videos

Assessing the Multiple Dimensions of Engagement to Characterize Learning: A Neurophysiological Perspective
13:57

Assessing the Multiple Dimensions of Engagement to Characterize Learning: A Neurophysiological Perspective

Published on: July 1, 2015

12.5K
Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
08:53

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community

Published on: May 31, 2019

5.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 8, 2025

Measuring Engagement of Spectators of Social Digital Games
14:02

Measuring Engagement of Spectators of Social Digital Games

Published on: July 3, 2021

3.5K
Assessing the Multiple Dimensions of Engagement to Characterize Learning: A Neurophysiological Perspective
13:57

Assessing the Multiple Dimensions of Engagement to Characterize Learning: A Neurophysiological Perspective

Published on: July 1, 2015

12.5K
Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
08:53

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community

Published on: May 31, 2019

5.2K

Area of Science:

  • Social Sciences
  • Communication Studies
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Online misinformation research is rapidly evolving.
  • Systematic organization of findings and identification of research gaps are challenging.
  • Existing frameworks may not fully capture user engagement with misinformation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a systematic framework for classifying user engagement with online misinformation.
  • To identify intervention points within the user engagement process.
  • To highlight under-addressed stages in combating misinformation.

Main Methods:

  • Development of the Online Misinformation Engagement Framework.
  • Classification of engagement into four distinct stages: source selection, information consumption, evaluation, and reaction.
  • Analysis of intervention opportunities at each stage.

Main Results:

  • The framework categorizes engagement into four stages: source selection, information consumption, evaluation, and reaction.
  • Intervention points are identified across all four stages.
  • Source and information selection stages are identified as relatively neglected but critical.

Conclusions:

  • The Online Misinformation Engagement Framework provides a structured approach to understanding user interaction with misinformation.
  • Focusing on early-stage processes like source and information selection is crucial for effective interventions.
  • Further research into these early stages can enhance public resilience to online misinformation.