Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 29, 2026

Technique and Patient Selection Criteria of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy for Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement
Published on: March 26, 2018
Current review of acute type A aortic dissection in Malaysia
Paneer Selvam Krishna Moorthy1, Abdul Samad Sakijan2, Deventhiran Permal2
1Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, National Heart Institute, 145 Jalan Tun Razak, 50400 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Insights
Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) presents surgical challenges, with outcomes often poor, especially in malperfusion syndrome (MPS). Optimal therapy remains debated, necessitating urgent, expert surgical intervention for better results.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Thoracic Surgery
- Vascular Surgery
Background:
- Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) remains a significant clinical challenge globally.
- Despite advancements, outcomes for ATAAD, particularly with malperfusion syndrome (MPS), are often poor, and optimal treatment strategies are debated.
- Delayed diagnosis contributes to variable patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review current literature and analyze outcomes of surgical repair for ATAAD.
- To highlight the challenges and management dilemmas in ATAAD, focusing on surgical outcomes.
- To discuss the role of advanced surgical techniques in improving long-term benefits for selected ATAAD patients.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of current management strategies for ATAAD.
- Analysis of data from the Aortic Registry of the National Heart Institute of Malaysia (NHIM).
- Examination of various surgical techniques and perfusion strategies employed in ATAAD treatment.
Main Results:
- Surgical repair outcomes for ATAAD are variable, often influenced by diagnostic delays.
- Urgent treatment and a high index of suspicion are crucial for managing this dynamic disease.
- Complex procedures like total arch replacement (TAR) with frozen elephant trunk and valve-sparing root surgery show potential for long-term benefits in specific patient groups.
Conclusions:
- ATAAD requires a high index of suspicion and prompt management due to its varied presentation and clinical course.
- Advanced surgical techniques, while demanding expertise, may offer improved long-term outcomes for carefully selected ATAAD patients.
- Optimal therapy for ATAAD, especially with MPS, continues to be a subject of debate, underscoring the need for experienced surgical teams.
Abstract:
Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) still poses significant challenges and management dilemmas for cardiovascular surgeons worldwide. Despite the continuous improvement in diagnosis and management strategies for ATAAD, clinical outcomes remain poor and the optimal therapy is still debatable especially those with malperfusion syndrome (MPS). This review is based on the current literature and includes the results from the Aortic Registry of National Heart Institute of Malaysia (NHIM) database. It covers different aspects of ATAAD and concentrates on the outcome of surgical repair. The diagnosis is often delayed leading to variable outcomes. High index of suspicion and urgent treatment is required to tackle this dynamic disease which include the variation in presentation and clinical course. Different surgical techniques and perfusion strategies have been described to save patients. Complex techniques such as total arch replacement (TAR) with frozen elephant trunk and valve sparing root surgery may provide long-term benefit in selected patients, but require significant surgical expertise and experience.
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aneurysm I: Introduction
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care

