Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2025
Purifying the Impure: Sequencing Metagenomes and Metatranscriptomes from Complex Animal-associated Samples
Published on: December 22, 2014
Clinical application of amplification-based versus amplification-free metagenomic next-generation sequencing test in
Zhe-Ying Wang1,2, Lu-Lu Li1, Xue-Lei Cao1,2
1Department of Clinical Laboratory, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Background:
Recently, metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) has been used in the diagnosis of infectious diseases (IDs) as an emerging and powerful tool. However, whether the complicated methodological variation in mNGS detections makes a difference in their clinical performance is still unknown. Here we conducted a method study on the clinical application of mNGS tests in the DNA detection of IDs.
Methods:
We analyzed the effect of several potential factors in the whole process of mNGS for DNA detection on microorganism identification in 98 samples of suspected ID patients by amplification-based mNGS. The amplification-based and amplification-free mNGS tests were successfully performed in 41 samples. Then we compared the clinical application of the two mNGS methods in the DNA detection of IDs.
Results:
We found that a higher concentration of extracted nucleic acid was more conducive to detecting microorganisms. Other potential factors, such as read depth and proportion of human reads, might not be attributed to microorganism identification. The concordance rate of amplification-based and amplification-free mNGS results was 80.5% (33/41) in the patients with suspected IDs. Amplification-based mNGS showed approximately 16.7% higher sensitivity than amplification-free mNGS. However, 4 cases with causative pathogens only detected by amplification-based mNGS were finally proved false-positive. In addition, empirical antibiotic treatments were adjusted in 18 patients following mNGS testing with unexpected pathogens.
Conclusions:
Amplification-based and amplification-free mNGS tests showed their specific advantages and disadvantages in the diagnosis of IDs. The clinical application of mNGS still needs more exploration from a methodological perspective. With advanced technology and standardized procedure, mNGS will play a promising role in the diagnosis of IDs and help guide the use of antibiotics.
