Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2025

Assessment of Dependence in Activities of Daily Living Among Older Patients in an Acute Care Unit
Published on: September 30, 2020
Treatment patterns and trajectories in patients after acute heart failure hospitalization
Ryo Nakamaru1,2, Yasuyuki Shiraishi1, Takashi Kohno3
1Department of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.
Aims:
The trajectories of systolic function after admission for acute heart failure (HF) and their effect on clinical outcomes have not been fully elucidated. We aimed to assess changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) between the index and 1 year after discharge and to examine their prognostic implications.
Methods And Results:
We extracted data from a prospective multicentre registry of patients hospitalized for acute HF and identified 1636 patients with LVEF data at admission and 1 year after discharge. We categorized them into five groups based on LVEF changes: HF with unchanged-preserved EF [HFunc-pEF (EF ≥ 50%); N = 527, 32.2%], unchanged-mildly reduced EF [HFunc-mrEF (EF 41-49%); N = 86, 5.3%], unchanged-reduced EF [HFunc-rEF (EF ≤ 40%); N = 377, 23.0%], worsened EF (HFworEF; N = 83, 5.1%), and improved EF (HFimpEF; N = 563, 34.4%). We then evaluated the subsequent composite outcome of cardiovascular death and HF readmission. During 1 year after discharge, 53% of patients with HF with reduced EF and 67% of those with HF with mildly reduced EF (HFmrEF) transitioned to other categories, whereas 92% of those with HF with preserved EF (HFpEF) remained within the same category. Patients with HFimpEF were more likely to be younger and had relatively preserved renal function, whereas those with HFworEF were the oldest and had more comorbidities among the five groups. After multivariable adjustment, patients with HFimpEF and HFunc-pEF had a lower risk for composite outcomes when referenced to patients with HFunc-rEF [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval), P-value: 0.28 (0.16-0.49), P < 0.001, and 0.40 (0.25-0.63), P < 0.001, respectively]. Conversely, patients with HFunc-mrEF and HFworEF had a comparable risk [0.44 (0.18-1.07), P = 0.07, and 0.63 (0.29-1.39), P = 0.26, respectively].
Conclusions:
A substantial number of patients with HF experienced transitions to other categories after discharge. Notably, patients with decreased EF experienced a worse prognosis, even with slight decreases (e.g. HFpEF transitioning to HFmrEF). These findings emphasize the significance of longitudinal assessments of systolic function to better manage patients following acute decompensation.
More Related Videos
05:15Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
14:35Post-Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure in Closed-chest Coronary Occlusion/Reperfusion Model in Göttingen Minipigs and Landrace Pigs
Published on: April 17, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac...
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Acute Respiratory Failure-V
Ensure that patients are monitored continuously for their response to therapy, including changes in...
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics