Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2025

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool
Published on: June 30, 2014
Selecting patient-reported outcome measures for a patient-facing technology
Priyank Raj1, Youmin Cho1, Yun Jiang2
1D. Bradley McWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, United States.
Selecting patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for breast cancer patients on oral therapies is crucial. For dedicated breast cancer apps, EORTC QLQ-C30 + EORTC QLQ-BR45 is recommended; for multi-cancer platforms, PRO-CTCAE + PROMIS 10 GH is advised.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Digital Health
- Patient-Reported Outcomes
Background:
- Oral anticancer agents are increasingly used for breast cancer (BCA) treatment.
- Patient-facing technology (PFT) platforms require robust methods for collecting patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).
- Selecting appropriate PROMs is essential for accurately assessing symptoms and quality of life in BCA patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To outline a systematic process for selecting PROMs for BCA patients undergoing oral anticancer agent treatment.
- To provide guidance on choosing PROMs suitable for integration into patient-facing technology (PFT) platforms.
- To balance patient needs with developer considerations for efficient PROM implementation.
Main Methods:
- A thorough assessment of available PROMs was conducted following established guidelines.
- PROMs were evaluated based on their content relevance for breast cancer patients.
- Considerations for PFT platform design, including interface feasibility and user workload, were incorporated.
Main Results:
- For a dedicated breast cancer application, the combination of EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BR45 is recommended.
- For multi-cancer PFT platforms, PRO-CTCAE and PROMIS 10 GH are suggested due to interface and workload considerations.
- The addition of ad hoc items to complement selected PROMs is advised for comprehensive data collection.
Conclusions:
- The selection of PROMs for PFT platforms requires careful consideration of specific cancer types and platform scope.
- The recommended PROMs aim to optimize data collection while minimizing patient and developer burden.
- This guidance assists PFT developers in navigating the complexities of PROM selection for oncology patient populations.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Methods of Documentation II: POMR
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Patient-centered Care
Current Trends in Nursing II

