Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2025
Author Spotlight: Bridging Gaps in Anatomy and Establishing a Foundation for Algorithmic Studies
Published on: December 15, 2023
Performance Test of a Well-Trained Model for Meningioma Segmentation in Health Care Centers: Secondary Analysis Based
Chaoyue Chen1, Yuen Teng1, Shuo Tan2
1Neurosurgery Department, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Background:
Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have produced state-of-the-art results in meningioma segmentation on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, images obtained from different institutions, protocols, or scanners may show significant domain shift, leading to performance degradation and challenging model deployment in real clinical scenarios.
Objective:
This research aims to investigate the realistic performance of a well-trained meningioma segmentation model when deployed across different health care centers and verify the methods to enhance its generalization.
Methods:
This study was performed in four centers. A total of 606 patients with 606 MRIs were enrolled between January 2015 and December 2021. Manual segmentations, determined through consensus readings by neuroradiologists, were used as the ground truth mask. The model was previously trained using a standard supervised CNN called Deeplab V3+ and was deployed and tested separately in four health care centers. To determine the appropriate approach to mitigating the observed performance degradation, two methods were used: unsupervised domain adaptation and supervised retraining.
Results:
The trained model showed a state-of-the-art performance in tumor segmentation in two health care institutions, with a Dice ratio of 0.887 (SD 0.108, 95% CI 0.903-0.925) in center A and a Dice ratio of 0.874 (SD 0.800, 95% CI 0.854-0.894) in center B. Whereas in the other health care institutions, the performance declined, with Dice ratios of 0.631 (SD 0.157, 95% CI 0.556-0.707) in center C and 0.649 (SD 0.187, 95% CI 0.566-0.732) in center D, as they obtained the MRI using different scanning protocols. The unsupervised domain adaptation showed a significant improvement in performance scores, with Dice ratios of 0.842 (SD 0.073, 95% CI 0.820-0.864) in center C and 0.855 (SD 0.097, 95% CI 0.826-0.886) in center D. Nonetheless, it did not overperform the supervised retraining, which achieved Dice ratios of 0.899 (SD 0.026, 95% CI 0.889-0.906) in center C and 0.886 (SD 0.046, 95% CI 0.870-0.903) in center D.
Conclusions:
Deploying the trained CNN model in different health care institutions may show significant performance degradation due to the domain shift of MRIs. Under this circumstance, the use of unsupervised domain adaptation or supervised retraining should be considered, taking into account the balance between clinical requirements, model performance, and the size of the available data.
