Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Associative Learning

Associative Learning

Associative learning is a fundamental concept in behavioral psychology, wherein a connection is established between two stimuli or events, leading to a learned response. This process is critical in understanding how behaviors are acquired and modified. Conditioning, the mechanism through which associations are formed, can be divided into two main types: classical conditioning and operant conditioning, each elucidating different aspects of associative learning.
Classical conditioning, also known...

Labeling Emotion

Labeling Emotion

Emotional labeling is a cognitive process that involves identifying and naming one's emotions, such as anger, fear, happiness, or sadness. It allows individuals to recognize and express their internal emotional states, a critical aspect of emotional regulation and communication. Labeling emotions requires more than mere recognition; it also involves drawing upon memory and contextual cues to understand the current situation and apply a corresponding emotional label. For instance, feeling...

Labeling DNA Probes

Labeling DNA Probes

DNA probes are fragments of DNA labeled with a reporter tag to enable their detection or purification. The resulting labeled DNA probes can then hybridize to target nucleic acid sequences through complementary base-pairing, and may be used to recover or identify these regions.
Radioisotopes, fluorophores, or small molecule binding partners like biotin or digoxigenin, are the most widely used reporter tags for labeling DNA probes. These labels can be attached to the probe DNA molecule via...

Purposive Learning

Purposive Learning

E. C. Tolman emphasized the purposiveness of behavior — the idea that much of our behavior is goal-directed. For instance, employees who aim for a promotion work diligently to meet their targets. Tolman argued that when classical conditioning and operant conditioning occur, the organism acquires certain expectations. In classical conditioning, a child might fear a dog because they expect it to bite. In operant conditioning, a person might consistently work overtime because they expect a...

Classical Conditioning

Classical Conditioning

Associative learning, a core principle in behavioral psychology, involves forming connections between events and facilitating learned responses. This concept is vividly illustrated by classical conditioning, a process extensively studied by the Russian physiologist Ivan Pavlov. Pavlov's pioneering research on dogs' digestive systems led to the discovery that behaviors can be learned through association, laying the groundwork for classical conditioning.
Ivan Pavlov observed that dogs...

Cognitive Learning

Cognitive Learning

Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Association Between Symptom Characteristics, Knowledge Sources, and Patient Interpretation of Acute Coronary Syndrome: Insights From the Japanese Circulation Society Chest Pain Registry.

Circulation reports·2026

Same author

Multiorgan Fibrosis and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: Genetic and Observational Evidence Highlighting a Causal Role of Pancreatic Fibrosis.

Diabetes·2025

Same author

Association between endotracheal intubation and outcomes of nonshockable out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Japan.

BMC emergency medicine·2025

Same author

Strategies for Reducing Sudden Cardiac Death by Raising Public Awareness　- A Statement From the Education and Implementation for Cardiac Emergency Committee of the Japanese Circulation Society.

Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society·2024

Same author

Effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation at low risk of stroke in japan: a retrospective cohort study.

European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy·2023

Same author

Ischemic heart disease cause of intradialytic hypertension in a patient with diabetic nephropathy.

Journal of cardiology cases·2020

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 8, 2025

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Published on: February 8, 2019

Q&A Label Learning.

Kota Kawamoto¹, Masato Uchida²

¹Waseda University, Tokyo 169-8555, Japan kkwmt0929@ruri.waseda.jp.

Neural Computation

|December 15, 2023

Summary

We introduce Q&A labeling, a new supervised machine learning annotation method. This approach derives a label generative model, ensuring statistical consistency for classification tasks.

Area of Science:

Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence
Data Science

Background:

Supervised machine learning relies heavily on accurate instance labeling.
Existing annotation methods often assume label generative models.
A need exists for novel annotation techniques that derive these models.

Purpose of the Study:

To propose and analyze a novel annotation method called Q&A labeling.
To derive a generative model of labels based on the Q&A labeling process.
To evaluate the classification risk and error bounds associated with Q&A labels.

Main Methods:

Development of a question generator and annotator for the Q&A labeling process.
Derivation of a generative model of labels from two distinct Q&A labeling procedures.

More Related Videos

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

Combining Eye-tracking Data with an Analysis of Video Content from Free-viewing a Video of a Walk in an Urban Park Environment

Combining Eye-tracking Data with an Analysis of Video Content from Free-viewing a Video of a Walk in an Urban Park Environment

Published on: May 7, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 8, 2025

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Published on: February 8, 2019

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

Combining Eye-tracking Data with an Analysis of Video Content from Free-viewing a Video of a Walk in an Urban Park Environment

Combining Eye-tracking Data with an Analysis of Video Content from Free-viewing a Video of a Walk in an Urban Park Environment

Published on: May 7, 2019

Formulation of a loss function to assess classification risk using Q&A labeled instances.

Main Results:

The derived label generative model shows partial consistency with previously assumed models.
The Q&A labeling method allows for the derivation, not assumption, of the label generative model.
Statistical consistency was observed in machine learning using instances labeled via Q&A methods.

Conclusions:

Q&A labeling offers a novel, data-driven approach to instance annotation in supervised learning.
The derived generative model and loss function provide theoretical grounding for Q&A label usage.
This method enhances the reliability and understanding of classification tasks utilizing Q&A labels.