Intra and inter-rater variability in the construction of patient-specific musculoskeletal model

Variations observed in biomechanical studies might be attributed to errors made by operators during the construction of musculoskeletal models, rather than being solely attributed to patient-specific geometry.

What is the impact of operator errors on the construction of musculoskeletal models, and how does it affect the estimation of muscle moment arms and hip joint reaction forces?

Thirteen independent operators participated in defining the muscle model, while a single operator performed 13 repetitions to define the muscle model based on 3D bone geometry. For each model, the muscle moment arms relative to the hip joint center of rotation was evaluated. Additionally, the hip joint reaction force during one-legged stance was assessed using static inverse optimization.

The results indicated high levels of consistency, as evidenced by the intra- rater and inter-rater agreement measured by the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), which yielded values of 0.95 and 0.99, respectively. However, the estimated muscle moment arms exhibited an error of up to 16 mm compared to the reference musculoskeletal model. It was found that muscles attached to prominent anatomical landmarks were specified with greater accuracy than those attached over larger areas. Furthermore, the variability in estimated moment arms contributed to variations of up to 12% in the hip joint reaction forces.

Both moment arm and muscle force demonstrated significantly lower variability when assessed by a single operator, suggesting the preference for employing a single operator in the creation of musculoskeletal models for clinical biomechanical studies.