Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2025

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Comparison of models for stroke-free survival prediction in patients with CADASIL
Henri Chhoa1, Hugues Chabriat2,3, Sylvie Chevret1
1ECSTRRA Team, Université Paris Cité, UMR1153, INSERM, Paris, France.
Insights
Predicting stroke-free survival in Cerebral Autosomal Dominant Arteriopathy with Subcortical Infarcts and Leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) is crucial. Machine learning models, particularly gradient boosting and random survival forests with LASSO feature selection, show strong predictive performance.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Genetics
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Cerebral Autosomal Dominant Arteriopathy with Subcortical Infarcts and Leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) is a genetic disorder caused by NOTCH3 gene mutations.
- CADASIL exhibits heterogeneous progression, impacting clinical scores and leading to various clinical events.
- Accurate prediction of disease progression, specifically stroke-free survival time, is essential for patient management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the predictive performance of Cox proportional hazards regression with machine learning models for stroke-free survival in CADASIL.
- To evaluate the efficacy of four different feature selection approaches in conjunction with these models.
- To identify the optimal modeling strategy for assessing CADASIL disease progression.
Main Methods:
- Utilized demographic, clinical, and magnetic resonance imaging data from a cohort of 482 CADASIL patients.
- Employed Cox proportional hazards regression and machine learning models (gradient boosting, random survival forest).
- Applied a nested cross-validation procedure with LASSO feature selection, evaluating performance using time-dependent Brier Score and AUC at 5 years.
Main Results:
- The componentwise gradient boosting model with LASSO achieved the best overall performance (mean Brier score: 0.165).
- The random survival forest model with LASSO demonstrated the highest discrimination ability (mean AUC: 0.773).
- Both models, when combined with LASSO feature selection, outperformed traditional regression methods.
Conclusions:
- Machine learning models, especially gradient boosting and random survival forests, combined with LASSO feature selection, are effective for predicting stroke-free survival in CADASIL.
- These advanced modeling techniques offer improved accuracy and discrimination compared to traditional methods.
- The findings support the use of these predictive tools for better assessment and management of CADASIL patients.
Abstract:
Cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy, which is caused by mutations of the NOTCH3 gene, has a large heterogeneous progression, presenting with declines of various clinical scores and occurrences of various clinical event. To help assess disease progression, this work focused on predicting the composite endpoint of stroke-free survival time by comparing the performance of Cox proportional hazards regression to that of machine learning models using one of four feature selection approaches applied to demographic, clinical and magnetic resonance imaging observational data collected from a study cohort of 482 patients. The quality of the modeling process and the predictive performance were evaluated in a nested cross-validation procedure using the time-dependent Brier Score and AUC at 5 years from baseline, the former measuring the overall performance including calibration and the latter highlighting the discrimination ability, with both metrics taking into account the presence of right-censoring. The best model for each metric was the componentwise gradient boosting model with a mean Brier score of 0.165 and the random survival forest model with a mean AUC of 0.773, both combined with the LASSO feature selection method.
Related Concept Videos
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Cancer Survival Analysis
Assumptions of Survival Analysis

