Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2025

Metacarpal Small Incision for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Published on: April 5, 2024
Best-Evidence Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release Outcomes
Larry E Miller1, Warren C Hammert2, Kevin C Chung3
1Miller Scientific, Johnson City, TN.
Purpose:
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) using best-evidence synthesis methods.
Methods:
A systematic search of multiple databases was conducted for prospective contemporary studies published between January 2013 and January 2023 with at least 50 ECTR cases. Outcomes included the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (Q-DASH) measured on a 0-100 scale, Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire Symptom Severity Scale (BCTQ-SSS) and Functional Status Scale (BCTQ-FSS) on a 1-5 scale, pain visual analog scale on a 0-10 scale, conversion to open carpal tunnel release (CTR), complications, and reoperations. Outcomes were analyzed using a random-effects meta-analysis model. Metaregression was used to determine the association of patient- and study-level factors with ECTR outcomes.
Results:
A total of 17 studies with 1,632 patients treated with ECTR were included. Median follow-up durations ranged from 4 to 7 months depending on the outcome. Statistically significant and clinically important improvements were noted after ECTR for Q-DASH, BCTQ-SSS, BCTQ-FSS, and pain visual analog scale scores, with mean differences from baseline of -28.8, -1.8, -1.5, and -5.1, respectively (P < .001 for all). In metaregression, the strongest predictor of improvement in Q-DASH, BCTQ-SSS, and BCTQ-FSS was a greater preoperative score for that variable (all P ≤ .005), indicating that patients with worse symptoms improved the most. The risks of conversion to open CTR, complications, and revision CTR were 0.7%, 0.7%, and 0.5%, respectively.
Conclusions:
In a best-evidence synthesis of contemporary studies, ECTR resulted in significant improvements in function and pain, with a low risk of conversion to open surgery, complications, and reoperations over short-term follow-up.
Clinical Relevance:
Patients treated with ECTR can expect generally favorable clinical outcomes over the short term. However, long-term outcomes after ECTR are not well characterized.
More Related Videos
06:40Screening of Axonal Degeneration in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Using Ultrasonography and Nerve Conduction Studies
Published on: January 11, 2019
05:18Author Spotlight: Ultrasound-Guided Needle Release Combined with Corticosteroid Injection for the Treatment of Supinator Syndrome
Published on: May 26, 2023