Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Debiased lasso for stratified Cox models with application to the national kidney transplant data
Abstract:
The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) system has become a rich resource for understanding the complex mechanisms of graft failure after kidney transplant, a crucial step for allocating organs effectively and implementing appropriate care. As transplant centers that treated patients might strongly confound graft failures, Cox models stratified by centers can eliminate their confounding effects. Also, since recipient age is a proven non-modifiable risk factor, a common practice is to fit models separately by recipient age groups. The moderate sample sizes, relative to the number of covariates, in some age groups may lead to biased maximum stratified partial likelihood estimates and unreliable confidence intervals even when samples still outnumber covariates. To draw reliable inference on a comprehensive list of risk factors measured from both donors and recipients in SRTR, we propose a de-biased lasso approach via quadratic programming for fitting stratified Cox models. We establish asymptotic properties and verify via simulations that our method produces consistent estimates and confidence intervals with nominal coverage probabilities. Accounting for nearly 100 confounders in SRTR, the de-biased method detects that the graft failure hazard nonlinearly increases with donor's age among all recipient age groups, and that organs from older donors more adversely impact the younger recipients. Our method also delineates the associations between graft failure and many risk factors such as recipients' primary diagnoses (e.g. polycystic disease, glomerular disease, and diabetes) and donor-recipient mismatches for human leukocyte antigen loci across recipient age groups. These results may inform the refinement of donor-recipient matching criteria for stakeholders.
Insights
A new de-biased lasso method improves analysis of kidney transplant graft failure, revealing older donor age nonlinearly increases failure risk, especially for younger recipients. This aids organ allocation and matching criteria refinement.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Transplantation Medicine
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Kidney transplant graft failure is complex, influenced by donor and recipient factors.
- Existing statistical models face limitations with large datasets and numerous confounders, potentially biasing results.
- Transplant center effects and recipient age are known confounders requiring careful statistical handling.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a robust statistical method for analyzing kidney transplant graft failure using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) data.
- To accurately identify and quantify risk factors for graft failure, accounting for numerous confounders.
- To provide reliable inference for refining organ allocation and donor-recipient matching criteria.
Main Methods:
- Proposed a de-biased lasso approach via quadratic programming for fitting stratified Cox models.
- Stratified models by transplant centers and recipient age groups to control for confounding.
- Established asymptotic properties and validated the method through simulations.
Main Results:
- The de-biased method provides consistent estimates and reliable confidence intervals.
- Graft failure hazard nonlinearly increases with donor age across all recipient age groups.
- Older donor organs disproportionately affect younger recipients, and associations with diagnoses and HLA mismatches were delineated.
Conclusions:
- The de-biased lasso approach offers a reliable statistical framework for analyzing complex transplant data.
- Findings highlight the critical impact of donor age, particularly on younger recipients, and identify key risk factors.
- Results can inform evidence-based refinements in kidney allocation and donor-recipient matching strategies.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
The Mantel-Cox Log-Rank Test
Truncation in Survival Analysis
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are...
Stratified Sampling Method
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...
Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Median of Single Population
Cancer Survival Analysis
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

