Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2025
3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects
Published on: August 4, 2020
Intercalary Prosthetic Reconstruction with Three-Dimensional-Printed Custom-Made Porous Component for Defects of Long
Zhuangzhuang Li1,2, Minxun Lu1,2, Yuqi Zhang1,2
1Department of Orthopedics, Orthopaedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Background:
Intercalary reconstruction for patients with short residual bone segments remains challenging. Three-dimensional (3D)-printed custom-made porous implants are a promising technique for short-segment fixation in these patients. This study aims to evaluate the efficiency of 3D-printed custom-made porous components (3DCPCs) for short-segment fixation, focusing on prosthesis survivorship, radiographic results, and potential complications.
Methods:
This retrospective study involved 39 patients who underwent intercalary prosthetic reconstruction with 3DCPCs after tumor resection of the femur, tibia, or humerus from June 2015 to October 2020. Segment bone loss involved the femur (n = 15), tibia (n = 16), and humerus (n = 8), leaving 78 residual bone segments. There were 46 short segments requiring 46 3DCPCs and 32 segments with the ability to accommodate 32 off-the-shelf standard uncemented stems for prosthesis fixation. Clinical and functional outcomes were evaluated. Prosthesis-overall survivorship and prosthesis-specific survivorship were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Radiographic results and modes of failure of using this technique were also examined.
Results:
The mean follow-up was 41 months. The prosthesis-overall survivorship was 87.2% and 84.6% at 2 and 5 years, respectively. The prosthesis-specific survivorship was 92.1% and 89.5% at 2 and 5 years, respectively. There was not a substantial difference in prosthesis survivorship among the femur, tibia, and humerus. The average MSTS score was 26.2, ranging from 22 to 28. The radiographic evaluation results revealed excellent or good interface (38/46) in most of the 46 porous components. A total of 38 of 46 bone segments' remolding demonstrated no change. In total, seven patients (16.3%) had complications requiring further surgery.
Conclusion:
The prosthesis survivorship of using 3DCPCs for short-segment fixation is similar or better compared to other studies involving intercalary prosthetic reconstruction with short-segment fixation. Radiographic evaluation revealed good osteointegration and avoidance of stress shielding. Overall, intercalary prosthetic reconstruction with 3DCPC is a feasible modality for patients with short residual bone segments after tumor resection.
