Risk-benefit trade-offs and precision utilities in phase I-II clinical trials

Pavlos Msaouel1,2,3, Juhee Lee4, Peter F Thall5

  • 1Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Optimizing drug doses in early clinical trials is crucial. A precision phase I-II design tailors doses to patient subgroups, balancing efficacy and toxicity for better risk-benefit profiles.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Pharmacology
  • Biostatistics
  • Oncology Drug Development

Background:

  • Optimal dose identification in early-phase clinical trials is critical for therapeutic success and regulatory approval.
  • Suboptimal dosing can lead to ineffective or unsafe treatments, jeopardizing subsequent trial phases and market access.
  • Dose-finding requires balancing biological efficacy, toxicity, and patient quality of life.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a precision phase I-II clinical trial design that accounts for both efficacy and toxicity.
  • To incorporate patient covariates and prognostic subgroups for personalized dose selection.
  • To optimize the risk-benefit trade-off by tailoring doses to individual patient characteristics and subgroups.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a stepwise process for clinical trial design, integrating clinical practice considerations.
  • Proposed a precision phase I-II design utilizing utility functions tailored to prognostic subgroups.
  • The design optimizes individual patient expected utility, allowing for subgroup-specific optimal doses.

Main Results:

  • The precision design enables identification of optimal doses that maximize expected utility for individual patients.
  • Demonstrated that different prognostic subgroups may benefit from distinct optimal doses.
  • Illustrated the application of the design in a dose-finding trial for metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Conclusions:

  • Precision dose-finding designs are essential for maximizing therapeutic benefits while minimizing risks.
  • Tailoring doses to prognostic subgroups improves the risk-benefit profile in early-phase trials.
  • This approach enhances the likelihood of success in subsequent clinical development and regulatory approval.

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
130
Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
3.0K
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
6.7K
Preclinical Development: Overview01:28

Preclinical Development: Overview

Preclinical development consists of a series of tests that ensure the safety and efficacy of a new therapeutic compound before it is tested in humans. There are four main phases to this process. First, safety pharmacology tests are conducted to ensure the drug does not produce any acutely harmful effects. These tests examine parameters such as bronchoconstriction, cardiac dysrhythmias, blood pressure changes, and ataxia. Next, preliminary toxicological testing is performed to determine the...
4.4K
Therapeutic Index01:13

Therapeutic Index

The therapeutic index of a drug is a key parameter in pharmacology that quantifies the relative safety of a drug by calculating the ratio between the dose that causes toxicity in half the population (50%) to the dose that proves to be effective for half the population (50%). It provides a spectrum of doses for a particular drug ranging from effective to potentially toxic. To illustrate, consider an anticoagulant agent like warfarin. It possesses a narrow window within its therapeutic index to...
4.3K
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
130