Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2025

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation
Published on: September 4, 2017
Deep learning-based tools to distinguish plan-specific from generic deviations in EPID-based in vivo dosimetry
Igor Olaciregui-Ruiz1, Rita Simões1, Sonke Jan-Jakob1
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Deep learning tools can identify false positives in electronic portal imaging device (EPID)-based in vivo dosimetry (EIVD) alerts and improve detection of patient-specific deviations, enhancing radiation therapy quality assurance.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiation Oncology
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Background:
- Electronic portal imaging device (EPID)-based in vivo dosimetry (EIVD) is crucial for radiation therapy quality assurance.
- Deviations between planned and delivered doses, categorized as generic or plan-specific, complicate EIVD analysis.
- Traditional gamma-evaluation methods struggle to differentiate and manage these deviation types effectively.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of deep learning (DL) tools in distinguishing generic deviations from plan-specific deviations in EIVD.
- To enhance the detectability of clinically relevant, patient-specific deviations during radiation therapy.
Main Methods:
- A 3D U-Net autoencoder was trained to identify patterns of generic deviations in gamma-distributions across various treatment sites (VMAT lung, prostate, head-and-neck; IMRT breast).
- The DL model's performance was compared against traditional gamma-analysis using receiver operator characteristic analysis for detecting introduced patient-related deviations (positioning, weight, tumor volume changes).
- Clinical relevance was assessed using 793 in vivo EIVD cases.
Main Results:
- The DL network demonstrated superior error detectability for patient-related deviations compared to gamma-analysis (average AUC 0.86 vs. 0.69).
- Significant differences in classification were observed between DL and gamma-analysis, particularly for head-and-neck (18%) and breast (64%) cancer treatments.
- DL successfully identified patient-related deviations missed by gamma-analysis and distinguished true alerts from those caused by EPID limitations or TPS inaccuracies.
Conclusions:
- DL-based tools can automate the identification of false positive gamma-alerts arising from generic deviations.
- These DL tools significantly improve the detection of critical plan-specific deviations, reducing the risk of false negatives.
- The proposed DL method offers substantial added value for managing large-scale EIVD systems in radiation therapy.
More Related Videos
07:57Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
Published on: March 24, 2022
09:49A Whole Body Dosimetry Protocol for Peptide-Receptor Radionuclide Therapy PRRT: 2D Planar Image and Hybrid 2D+3D SPECT/CT Image Methods
Published on: April 24, 2020