Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2025

Intracortical Inhibition Within the Primary Motor Cortex Can Be Modulated by Changing the Focus of Attention
Published on: September 11, 2017
Cortical resting motor threshold difference in asleep-awake craniotomy for motor eloquent gliomas: WHO grading
Ana M Pescador1,2, José P Lavrador1, Alba D Baamonde1,2
1Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS, United Kingdom.
Abstract:
Developing neurophysiological tools to predict WHO tumor grade can empower the treating teams for a better surgical decision-making process. A total of 38 patients with supratentorial diffuse gliomas underwent an asleep-awake-sedated craniotomies for tumor removal with intraoperative neuromonitoring. The resting motor threshold was calculated for different train stimulation paradigms during awake and asleep phases. Receiver operating characteristic analysis and Bayesian regression models were performed to analyze the prediction of tumor grading based on the resting motor threshold differences. Significant positive spearman correlations were observed between resting motor threshold excitability difference and WHO tumor grade for train stimulation paradigms of 5 (R = 0.54, P = 0.00063), 4 (R = 0.49, P = 0.002), 3 (R = 0.51, P = 0.001), and 2 pulses (R = 0.54, P = 0.0007). Kruskal-Wallis analysis of the median revealed a positive significant difference between the median of excitability difference and WHO tumor grade in all paradigms. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed 3 mA difference as the best predictor of high-grade glioma across different patterns of motor pathway stimulation. Bayesian regression found that an excitability difference above 3 mA would indicate a 75.8% probability of a glioma being high grade. Our results suggest that cortical motor excitability difference between the asleep and awake phases in glioma surgery could correlate with tumor grade.
More Related Videos
11:06Bilateral Assessment of the Corticospinal Pathways of the Ankle Muscles Using Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Published on: February 19, 2019
08:55Online Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Protocol for Measuring Cortical Physiology Associated with Response Inhibition
Published on: February 8, 2018