Systematic review of the free thoracodorsal artery perforator flap for head and neck reconstruction
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2025
Porcine As a Training Module for Head and Neck Microvascular Reconstruction
Published on: September 29, 2018
Samuel E Razmi1, Payam Entezami2, Ameya A Asarkar3
1Texas A&M School of Medicine - EnMed, Houston, TX, USA.
Background:
The thoracodorsal artery perforator (TDAP) flap has gained interest as a option for reconstruction of head and neck defects while minimizing donor site morbidity as compared to traditional workhorse flaps. The primary aim of this systematic review is to assess the postoperative outcomes and efficacy of this flap.
Methods:
Several databases were screened for relevant citations. The quality of studies and risk of bias were evaluated using the MINORS scoring system.
Results:
Twenty articles containing 168 patients undergoing at least one TDAP flap reconstruction met the inclusion criteria. There were no incidences of total flap failure and only 10 incidences of partial flap failure (5.95 %). Flap complications and donor site morbidity was low. The average MINORS score of the studies suggested a moderately high amount of bias.
Conclusions:
Based on limited quality evidence, this review suggests that TDAP flap is a safe and feasible option for head and neck reconstruction with comparable success rates as other commonly used flaps, with low complication rate and donor site morbidity. Further large-scale studies are warranted.
