Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 23, 2026

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats
Published on: June 18, 2018
Automating licking bias correction in a two-choice delayed match-to-sample task to accelerate learning
Jongrok Do1,2, Min Whan Jung3,4, Doyun Lee5
1Department of Biological Sciences, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, 34141, Republic of Korea.
This study introduces an automated system to correct animal choice bias in learning tasks. By adjusting lickport positions and trial rewards, the system effectively reduces bias and improves learning performance.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Animal Behavior
Background:
- Choice bias in animals can hinder learning in tasks like the delayed match-to-sample (DMS).
- Traditional DMS tasks using two-alternative lickports are valuable for studying cognitive functions but are limited by training time due to side bias.
Purpose of the Study:
- To implement and evaluate an automated system for correcting side bias in head-fixed mice during olfactory DMS tasks.
- To investigate the effectiveness of dynamic adjustments in lickport position and trial reward ratios in mitigating biased licking responses.
Main Methods:
- An automated side bias correction system was developed for olfactory DMS tasks.
- The system dynamically adjusted lickport distances and the ratio of left- vs. right-rewarded trials based on licking behavior.
- The correction algorithm repositioned lickports and altered trial proportions to counterbalance bias.
Main Results:
- The automated system effectively reduced side bias in mice by adjusting lickport distances and trial reward proportions.
- These adjustments correlated with significant improvements in behavioral performance during the DMS task.
- The implemented correction strategy proved successful in mitigating biased licking responses.
Conclusions:
- The automated side bias correction system is a valuable tool for improving the efficiency and applicability of two-alternative choice tasks in animal research.
- This method can accelerate training and enhance the study of sensory processing, working memory, and associative memory.
Related Concept Videos
Improving Translational Accuracy
Improving Translational Accuracy
Random and Systematic Errors
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Random and Systematic Errors
Distribution Reliability and Automation

