Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2025
Enhancing the Development and Growth of Infant Cerebral Palsy Rats Using Selective Spinal Manipulations
Published on: February 2, 2024
Early stimulation for neuropsychomotor development in children with microcephaly: a systematic review
Gabrielle Mascarenhas Canto1, Katia de Miranda Avena1
1Faculdade Zarns, Curso de Medicina, Salvador, BA, Brazil.
Insights
Early stimulation shows limited evidence for improving neuropsychomotor development in children with microcephaly. More randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm these findings for early intervention effectiveness.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Developmental Neuroscience
- Rehabilitation Medicine
Background:
- Microcephaly presents significant challenges to neuropsychomotor development.
- Early intervention is crucial for optimizing developmental outcomes in affected children.
Approach:
- A systematic review was performed across major biomedical databases.
- Included studies focused on early stimulation interventions for children with microcephaly.
- Outcomes assessed included motor skills, cognitive function, and socioemotional behavior.
Key Points:
- Seven studies with a total of 125 participants met the inclusion criteria.
- The overall evidence for early stimulation's impact on development was low.
- Specific outcomes evaluated were muscle tone, social interaction, motor skills, IQ, and behavior.
Conclusions:
- Current evidence suggests a low impact of early intervention on the developmental outcomes of children with microcephaly.
- Further high-quality randomized clinical trials are essential to establish the efficacy of early stimulation.
Objective:
To systematically review studies on the effects of early stimulation on the neuropsychomotor development of children with microcephaly.
Data Source:
A systematic review was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Virtual Health Library, and Cochrane Library databases. Studies that addressed the use of early stimulation in playful and interactive environments in children with microcephaly were included. There were no restrictions on the publication date or language of the studies. The outcomes assessed were muscle tone, social interaction, fine and gross motor skills, intelligence quotient, socioemotional and adaptive behavior of the child. The methodological quality and the scientific evidence level were assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions, the Revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation.
Data Synthesis:
264 articles were identified, but only 7 met the eligibility criteria. The included studies had a total population of 125 individuals, with sample sizes ranging from 1 to 71 participants.
Conclusions:
The studies showed low evidence of an effect of early intervention on the outcomes muscle tone, social interaction, fine and gross motor skills, intelligence quotient, and socioemotional and adaptive behavior in children with microcephaly. However, further randomized clinical trials are needed.
