Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Tumor Immunotherapy01:27

Tumor Immunotherapy

529
Immunotherapy is a treatment that boosts or manipulates the immune system to fight diseases, including cancer. For instance, by stimulating an immune response through vaccinations against viruses that cause cancers, like hepatitis B virus and human papillomavirus, these diseases can be prevented. Nonetheless, some cancer cells can avoid the immune system due to their rapid mutation and division. The immune response to many cancers involves three phases: elimination, equilibrium, and escape.
529

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clinical decision support in hematological malignancies using a case-grounded AI agent.

Nature medicine·2026
Same author

Functional Outcome Prediction in Young Adults With Mental Health Symptoms Using Machine Learning and Large Language Models: Longitudinal Observational Study.

JMIR mental health·2026
Same author

Counterfactual Diffusion Models Provide Interpretable Explanations of Artificial Intelligence Models in Pathology.

Cancer research·2026
Same author

Towards autonomous medical artificial intelligence agents.

Nature·2026
Same author

Appendix300: Surgical video and patient metadata of 330 laparoscopic appendectomy cases from five institutions.

Scientific data·2026
Same author

Phase I trial of intravenous VCN-01 oncolytic adenovirus and durvalumab in patients with head and neck metastatic squamous cell carcinoma refractory to immunotherapy.

Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research·2026
Same journal

Comprehensive Profiling of Cell Surface Proteins in Testicular Germ Cell Tumors.

Cancer research communications·2026
Same journal

Tissue context shapes distinct premalignant outcomes in a HPV16 E6/E7-mutant Pik3ca transgenic mouse model.

Cancer research communications·2026
Same journal

Association of Cumulative Proton Pump Inhibitor Use with Prostate Cancer Risk and Outcomes: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

Cancer research communications·2026
Same journal

A phase 1b study of chemo-immunotherapy with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and Pembrolizumab in estrogen receptor positive metastatic breast cancer.

Cancer research communications·2026
Same journal

DNA Methyltransferase Inhibition Prevents Platinum-Induced Ovarian Cancer Stem Cell Enrichment.

Cancer research communications·2026
Same journal

Chemotherapy Induced Neutropenia in Palestinian Patients with Solid Malignancies: Patient Characteristics, Severity Risk Factors & Management Patterns.

Cancer research communications·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 7, 2025

Predictive Immune Modeling of Solid Tumors
08:50

Predictive Immune Modeling of Solid Tumors

Published on: February 25, 2020

7.0K

Weakly Supervised Deep Learning Predicts Immunotherapy Response in Solid Tumors Based on PD-L1 Expression.

Marta Ligero1, Garazi Serna2, Omar S M El Nahhas3

  • 1Radiomics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain.

Cancer Research Communications
|December 21, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A novel deep learning (DL) method accurately predicts programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) status from immunohistochemistry (IHC) images. This approach improves patient stratification for cancer immunotherapy beyond traditional scoring methods.

More Related Videos

Semi-automatic PD-L1 Characterization and Enumeration of Circulating Tumor Cells from Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients by Immunofluorescence
10:29

Semi-automatic PD-L1 Characterization and Enumeration of Circulating Tumor Cells from Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients by Immunofluorescence

Published on: August 14, 2019

10.6K
Multiplexed Immunofluorescence Analysis and Quantification of Intratumoral PD-1+ Tim-3+ CD8+ T Cells
09:32

Multiplexed Immunofluorescence Analysis and Quantification of Intratumoral PD-1+ Tim-3+ CD8+ T Cells

Published on: February 8, 2018

14.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 7, 2025

Predictive Immune Modeling of Solid Tumors
08:50

Predictive Immune Modeling of Solid Tumors

Published on: February 25, 2020

7.0K
Semi-automatic PD-L1 Characterization and Enumeration of Circulating Tumor Cells from Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients by Immunofluorescence
10:29

Semi-automatic PD-L1 Characterization and Enumeration of Circulating Tumor Cells from Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients by Immunofluorescence

Published on: August 14, 2019

10.6K
Multiplexed Immunofluorescence Analysis and Quantification of Intratumoral PD-1+ Tim-3+ CD8+ T Cells
09:32

Multiplexed Immunofluorescence Analysis and Quantification of Intratumoral PD-1+ Tim-3+ CD8+ T Cells

Published on: February 8, 2018

14.7K

Area of Science:

  • Computational pathology
  • Biomarker discovery
  • Cancer immunotherapy

Background:

  • Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry (IHC) is crucial for predicting response to cancer immunotherapy.
  • Current quantification methods (manual and computer-assisted) have limitations in reproducibility and predictive performance.
  • Accurate PD-L1 assessment is vital for effective patient stratification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a deep learning (DL) model for direct, end-to-end prediction of PD-L1 status from raw IHC image data.
  • To assess the model's ability to predict response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI).
  • To compare the DL model's performance with traditional PD-L1 quantification scores (Tumor Proportion Score [TPS] and Combined Positive Score [CPS]).

Main Methods:

  • A weakly supervised DL model was trained on PD-L1 stained non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) slides (MSK cohort).
  • The model was validated on a pan-cancer cohort (VHIO cohort).
  • The model predicted PD-L1 expression and response to ICIs, with performance compared against TPS and CPS.

Main Results:

  • The DL model demonstrated strong performance in predicting PD-L1 expression (AUC 0.88 in NSCLC, 0.80 in pan-cancer).
  • Predicted PD-L1 status showed a significantly improved association with ICI response (HR 1.5, P=0.049) compared to TPS (HR 1.4, P=0.082) and CPS (HR 1.2, P=0.386).
  • Explainability analysis revealed the model integrates both staining intensity and morphological factors.

Conclusions:

  • End-to-end weakly supervised DL offers a robust method for PD-L1 quantification from IHC images.
  • This approach has the potential to enhance patient stratification for cancer immunotherapy.
  • The DL model's holistic integration of morphology and staining intensity surpasses traditional assessment methods.