Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026
Endaural Endoscopic Atticoantrotomy Retrograde Mastoidectomy using a Constant Suction Bone-drilling Technique
Published on: May 23, 2021
Attic reconstruction techniques in cholesteatoma surgery: a comparative analysis of cartilage versus bone pate
Mohammad Al-Alawneh1, Ra'ed Al-Ashqar1, Isra Al-Omari1
1Department of Special Surgery, King Abdullah University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Background:
Cholesteatoma surgery involves canal wall down (CWD) and canal wall up (CWU) mastoidectomy. CWU is associated with higher cholesteatoma recurrence, often linked to attic retraction pockets. Attic reconstruction with cartilage or bone pate lacks comparative evidence.
Aims/Objectives:
To compare the effectiveness of cartilage and bone pate in attic reconstruction during CWU mastoidectomy for cholesteatoma.
Material And Methods:
We conducted a retrospective study at King Abdullah University Hospital (KAUH) in Jordan, analyzing surgeries performed from 2011 to 2021. Patients who underwent CWU mastoidectomy with attic reconstruction using tragal cartilage with perichondrium or bone pate were included.
Results:
Of 48 patients analyzed, 26 had cartilage graft attic reconstruction, and 22 received bone pate. Recurrent cholesteatoma occurred in 19.23% of the cartilage group but none in the bone pate group (p = .001). Ear discharge was observed in 19.23% of the cartilage group and 18.18% of the bone pate group, while tympanic membrane perforations and external auditory canal cholesteatoma were more prevalent in the cartilage group.
Conclusions And Significance:
Our study indicates that bone pate results in significantly lower cholesteatoma recurrence than cartilage grafting in CWU mastoidectomy attic reconstruction. Bone pate offers stability and favorable long-term outcomes for outer attic wall repair.
