Universal mandatory reporting policies show null effects in a statewide college sample

Area of Science:

• Higher Education Policy
• Campus Safety
• Sexual Misconduct Research

Background:

• Mandatory reporting policies (MRPs) for sexual misconduct are widely assumed to enhance campus safety.
• However, empirical evidence supporting the effectiveness of universal MRPs is limited.

Purpose of the Study:

• To investigate the prevalence of universal mandatory reporting policies (MRPs) in higher education.
• To examine the relationship between universal MRPs and sexual misconduct reporting and postreporting outcomes.

Main Methods:

• The study analyzed data from 188 institutions of higher education in New York.
• Data included information on MRPs and sexual misconduct reporting from annual security reports and to Title IX coordinators.
• Multivariate linear regression models were employed to assess the relationships.

Main Results:

• 44% of institutions have a universal MRP.
• Universal MRPs were not significantly associated with increased reporting to various campus authorities or security officers.
• No significant relationship was found between universal MRPs and postreporting outcomes such as referrals, no-contact orders, or judicial conduct processes.

Conclusions:

• Findings challenge the assumption that universal MRPs are effective in improving sexual misconduct reporting and outcomes.
• The study underscores the need for further research into the impact of MRPs on student-survivor experiences and access to resources.