Related Experiment Videos
Serious assaults by outpatients or former patients
American Journal of Psychotherapy
|October 1, 1986
Summary
Psychiatrists and psychologists rarely face serious injury from patient assaults, with risks similar to general public assault. Clinical experience did not correlate with assault victim status in this study.
Area of Science:
- Forensic Psychiatry
- Clinical Psychology
- Medical Professional Safety
Background:
- Assaults against mental health professionals are a concern.
- Understanding the specific risks for psychiatrists, clinical psychologists, and family practitioners is important for safety protocols.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify the incidence of serious injuries from patient assaults on mental health professionals.
- To compare assault rates among these professionals to the general population.
- To investigate the correlation between clinical experience and assault victimisation.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of assault incident data involving psychiatrists, clinical psychologists, and family practitioners.
- Comparison of assault rates with non-patient related assaults.
- Statistical analysis to determine the relationship between years of clinical experience and assault risk.
Main Results:
- Serious injuries from patient assaults are rare among psychiatrists, clinical psychologists, and family practitioners.
- The rate of significant assault is comparable to rates of assault in the general population, such as mugging.
- No statistically significant relationship was found between the extent of clinical experience and the likelihood of being a victim of assault.
Conclusions:
- Mental health professionals in these roles have a low risk of serious injury from patient assaults.
- Assault risk for these professionals is similar to that of the general public.
- Clinical experience does not appear to be a protective or risk factor for assault victimisation.