Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2025

Intramucosal Inoculation of Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells in Mice for Tumor Immune Profiling and Treatment Response Assessment
Published on: April 22, 2019
Comparison between a novel salivary marker and several clinical prognosticators in oral cavity cancer
Yi-Chan Lee1,2, Li-Yu Lee2,3, Yenlin Huang3,4,5
1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Keelung Taiwan.
Objectives:
This study aimed to investigate the association between salivary matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1) and clinicopathological parameters of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and compare the prognostic efficacy of salivary MMP-1 and other established circulating markers for OSCC.
Methods:
Saliva specimens from 479 OSCC subjects were examined using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The area under the curve (AUC) values of salivary MMP-1 and other markers were calculated, and survival analyses were conducted using Kaplan-Meier and multivariate regression methods.
Results:
Salivary MMP-1 showed good discrimination in predicting overall survival, with an AUC of 0.638, which was significantly higher than that of albumin (0.530, p = .021) and Charlson comorbidity index (0.568, p = .048) and comparable with neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (0.620, p = .987), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (0.575, p = .125), and squamous cell carcinoma antigen (0.609, p = .605). Elevated levels of salivary MMP-1 were significantly associated with higher pT classification, pN classification, overall pathological stage, positive extranodal extension, tumor differentiation, positive lymphovascular invasion, positive perineural invasion, and tumor depth (p all <.05). Multivariate analyses indicated that a higher level of salivary MMP-1 (≥2060.0 pg/mL) was an independent predictive factor of poorer overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.421 [95% confidential interval: 1.014-1.989], p = .041).
Conclusion:
The study found that the salivary MMP-1 level was significantly associated with many adverse clinicopathological parameters of OSCC. In OSCC, it was found to have superior efficacy in predicting prognosis and was an independent prognostic factor of post-treatment outcome.
Level Of Evidence:
3.

