Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2025
Novel Triple-Loop Technique for Suturing TFCC Injuries without Transosseous Tunnel
Published on: May 23, 2025
Proximal humerus fractures: Postoperative protocols and factors affecting treatment decisions among shoulder and
Brianna R Fram1, John T Strony1, Raymond E Chen1
1Thomas Jefferson University and the Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Background:
Proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) can lead to functional decline in geriatric and polytraumatized patients. Treatment of PHFs is an area of much debate and much variability between practitioners.
Objectives:
We surveyed orthopedic trauma (OT) and shoulder and elbow (SE) surgeons to evaluate differences in postoperative protocols when treating acute PHFs with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), intramedullary nailing (IMN), or hemi or reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA).
Materials And Methods:
We distributed a web-based survey to three OT and SE associations between August 2018-April 2019. Questions included practice characteristics, standard postoperative protocols for weight-bearing, lifting, and range of motion (ROM) by treatment modality, and factors affecting modality and postoperative protocol decisions. We compared the subspecialties.
Results:
239 surgeons [100 (42.2 %) OT, 118 (49.8 %) SE] completed the survey. OT were more likely to allow immediate ROM, lifting, and weight bearing following intramedullary nailing (IMN), open reduction internal fixation with a locking plate (ORIF), or arthroplasty (all p < 0.025), and to allow earlier unrestricted use of the extremity following IMN and arthroplasty (p = 0.001, p = 0.021 respectively). OT were more likely to consider operating on a PHF if there was contralateral upper extremity injury or need of the injured arm for work or activities of daily living (all p < 0.026). The subspecialties did not differ significantly on factors affecting their postoperative protocols. OT preferred IMN and SE surgeons preferred rTSA for allowing immediate unrestricted postoperative weight bearing, ROM, or lifting (all p < 0.001).
Conclusion:
There are significant differences in postoperative protocols between trauma and SE surgeons when treating PHFs. Postoperative protocols should be further studied to balance surgical outcomes and the risks of functional decline when treating patients with PHFs.
