Predictors and Impact of Timing of Disease Progression Following Primary Therapy in Multiple Myeloma

Sarah Goldman-Mazur1, Alissa Visram2, S Vincent Rajkumar1

  • 1Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN.

PubMed

Insights

Progression-free survival (PFS) duration significantly impacts multiple myeloma (MM) outcomes. Shorter PFS indicates worse survival, regardless of high-risk genetic factors, highlighting PFS as a key stratification parameter.

Area of Science:

  • Hematology
  • Oncology
  • Clinical Research

Background:

  • Multiple myeloma (MM) exhibits considerable variability in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
  • Understanding factors influencing PFS and OS is crucial for effective patient management and risk stratification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the impact of PFS duration on survival outcomes in MM patients.
  • To identify clinical and genetic factors associated with short PFS and their influence on survival.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 1557 MM patients.
  • Stratification of patients into short (<2 years), medium (2-5 years), and long (>5 years) PFS groups.
  • Multivariable analysis to identify predictors of short PFS and survival.

Main Results:

  • Short PFS (48.7%) was associated with significantly worse post-progression PFS and OS compared to long PFS (15.3%).
  • Worse survival in the short PFS group was observed irrespective of high-risk (HR) fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) features.
  • Short PFS correlated with HR FISH, extramedullary plasmacytoma, high plasma cell labeling index, non-IgG isotype, and suboptimal treatment response.

Conclusions:

  • PFS duration is a critical determinant of survival in MM, independent of HR cytogenetic abnormalities.
  • PFS should be integrated as a vital parameter for risk stratification in relapsed MM patients.

Related Concept Videos

Tumor Progression02:07

Tumor Progression

Tumor progression is a phenomenon where the pre-formed tumor acquires successive mutations to become clinically more aggressive and malignant. In the 1950s, Foulds first described the stepwise progression of cancer cells through successive stages.
Colon cancer is one of the best-documented examples of tumor progression. Early mutation in the APC gene in colon cells causes a small growth on the colon wall called a polyp. With time, this polyp grows into a benign, pre-cancerous tumor. Further...
6.3K
Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
355
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine02:50

Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine

Combining two or more treatment methods increases the life span of cancer patients while reducing damage to vital organs or tissue from the overuse of a single treatment. Combination therapy also targets different cancer-inducing pathways, thus reducing the chances of developing resistance to treatment.
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
4.9K
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
134