Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Modeling 24-Hour Blood Pressure Rhythms Using Mixed-Effects Cosinor Models.

Journal of biological rhythms·2026
Same author

Water Vapor Therapy for the Management of Prostate Cancer: The VAPOR 2 Study Initial Results of Ablative Efficacy and Toxicity.

The Journal of urology·2026
Same author

Clinical outcomes of benign prostatic hyperplasia surgery in men with detrusor underactivity versus normal contractility: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

International urology and nephrology·2026
Same author

Why Our Youth Vape?-A Trend Analysis Based on Cross-Sectional Annual Surveys of Middle and High School Students in the U.S.

Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)·2026
Same author

Phase II trial protocol of focal prostate ablation combined with androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer treatment.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Development and Validation of Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Depression Progression Using EHR Data: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Cohort Study.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 7, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing Prostate Cancer Research Through Improved Tissue Sampling and Biobanking
07:34

Author Spotlight: Advancing Prostate Cancer Research Through Improved Tissue Sampling and Biobanking

Published on: November 17, 2023

694

Reliability of Systematic and Targeted Biopsies versus Prostatectomy.

Tianyuan Guan1, Abhinav Sidana2, Marepalli B Rao3

  • 1College of Public Health, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44240, USA.

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)
|December 23, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Systematic biopsy (SBx) and MRI-guided biopsy (MRITBx) show fair agreement with prostatectomy for prostate cancer detection. MRITBx offers slightly higher accuracy, and new biomarkers aim to further improve diagnostic precision.

Keywords:
ROC curvearea under the curvebiomarkerlogistic regressionmachine learning methodsprostate cancersensitivityspecificitysystematic biopsytargeted biopsy

More Related Videos

Use of MRI-ultrasound Fusion to Achieve Targeted Prostate Biopsy
09:11

Use of MRI-ultrasound Fusion to Achieve Targeted Prostate Biopsy

Published on: April 9, 2019

21.5K
Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biopsy Data to Guide Sampling Procedures for Prostate Cancer Biobanking
05:49

Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biopsy Data to Guide Sampling Procedures for Prostate Cancer Biobanking

Published on: October 10, 2019

6.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 7, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing Prostate Cancer Research Through Improved Tissue Sampling and Biobanking
07:34

Author Spotlight: Advancing Prostate Cancer Research Through Improved Tissue Sampling and Biobanking

Published on: November 17, 2023

694
Use of MRI-ultrasound Fusion to Achieve Targeted Prostate Biopsy
09:11

Use of MRI-ultrasound Fusion to Achieve Targeted Prostate Biopsy

Published on: April 9, 2019

21.5K
Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biopsy Data to Guide Sampling Procedures for Prostate Cancer Biobanking
05:49

Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biopsy Data to Guide Sampling Procedures for Prostate Cancer Biobanking

Published on: October 10, 2019

6.6K

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Oncology
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Prostate cancer detection relies on systematic biopsy (SBx), with MRI-guided biopsy (MRITBx) offering potential improvements.
  • Prostatectomy provides definitive pathological assessment, serving as a benchmark for biopsy accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the reliability of SBx and MRITBx against prostatectomy findings using Gleason scores.
  • To compare the diagnostic accuracy of SBx and MRITBx in detecting prostate cancer.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis using Cohen's Kappa index and logistic regression on binarized Gleason scores.
  • Application of machine learning, specifically classification trees, for enhanced prediction.

Main Results:

  • Cohen's Kappa indicated fair agreement for both SBx (0.31) and MRITBx (0.34) versus prostatectomy.
  • SBx showed 83% sensitivity and 50% specificity; MRITBx demonstrated 78% sensitivity and 67% specificity compared to prostatectomy.
  • MRITBx exhibited a higher accuracy level than SBx in this comparison.

Conclusions:

  • While SBx and MRITBx do not fully replicate prostatectomy results, they remain valuable diagnostic tools.
  • Development of novel biomarkers and prediction models using classification trees can improve the accuracy of prostate cancer grading.