Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2025

Robotized Testing of Camera Positions to Determine Ideal Configuration for Stereo 3D Visualization of Open-Heart Surgery
Published on: August 12, 2021
An Error Estimation System for Close-Range Photogrammetric Systems and Algorithms
Anton Poroykov1, Olga Pechinskaya1, Ekaterina Shmatko1
1Moscow Power Engineering Institute, National Research University, Krasnokazarmennaya Str., 14, 111250 Moscow, Russia.
Physical modeling offers a more accurate way to estimate errors in close-range photogrammetry. This method compares photogrammetric results with a reference phasogrammetry system for flexible surfaces, revealing previously undetected error dependencies.
Area of Science:
- Metrology
- Photogrammetry
- Optical Measurement
Background:
- Close-range photogrammetry is crucial for non-contact 3D surface measurements.
- Accurate estimation of photogrammetric measurement error is challenging using theoretical or modeling approaches.
- Existing methods often fail to account for all factors influencing measurement accuracy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose and validate a physical modeling approach for accurate photogrammetric error estimation.
- To develop a laboratory system for evaluating close-range photogrammetry systems.
- To compare measurement results with a high-accuracy reference method under controlled conditions.
Main Methods:
- Developed a laboratory system for physical modeling of photogrammetric error.
- Utilized a flexible surface as a test object with varying shapes.
- Employed phasogrammetry as the reference measurement method for comparison.
- Experimentally evaluated the error of the reference method.
Main Results:
- The physical modeling technique allowed for error estimation under controlled conditions.
- Testing on a flexible surface provided insights into measurement accuracy across diverse shapes.
- The proposed method revealed error dependencies not detectable by standard approaches.
- Experimental validation confirmed the effectiveness of the developed system and technique.
Conclusions:
- Physical modeling provides a more robust method for photogrammetric error assessment.
- The developed laboratory system and technique are effective for evaluating photogrammetric systems.
- This approach enhances the understanding of measurement uncertainties in photogrammetry, especially for complex surfaces.
More Related Videos
08:09Measuring and Mapping Patterns of Soil Erosion and Deposition Related to Soil Carbonate Concentrations Under Agricultural Management
Published on: September 12, 2017
09:44Use of Principal Components for Scaling Up Topographic Models to Map Soil Redistribution and Soil Organic Carbon
Published on: October 16, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors
Electronic Distance Measuring Instruments
Distance Corrections
Types of Global Positioning System Surveys
Design Example: Identifying the Locations of Monuments in the Field Using Global Positioning System Device
Errors in Global Positioning System