Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2025

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
Published on: December 9, 2022
A Qualitative Textual Analysis of Feedback Comments in ePortfolios: Quality and Alignment with the CanMEDS Roles
Sofie Van Ostaeyen1, Mieke Embo2,3, Tijs Rotsaert1
1Department of Educational Sciences at Ghent University in Belgium, Belgium.
Introduction:
Competency-based education requires high-quality feedback to guide students' acquisition of competencies. Sound assessment and feedback systems, such as ePortfolios, are needed to facilitate seeking and giving feedback during clinical placements. However, it is unclear whether the written feedback comments in ePortfolios are of high quality and aligned with the current competency focus. Therefore, this study investigates the quality of written feedback comments in ePortfolios of healthcare students, as well as how these feedback comments align with the CanMEDS roles.
Methods:
A qualitative textual analysis was conducted. 2,349 written feedback comments retrieved from the ePortfolios of 149 healthcare students (specialist medicine, general practice, occupational therapy, speech therapy and midwifery) were analysed retrospectively using deductive content analysis. Two structured categorisation matrices, one based on four literature-derived feedback quality criteria (performance, judgment, elaboration and improvement) and another one on the seven CanMEDS roles (Medical Expert, Communicator, Collaborator, Leader, Health Advocate, Scholar and Professional), guided the analysis.
Results:
The minority of the feedback comments (n = 352; 14.9%) could be considered of high quality because they met all four quality criteria. Most feedback comments were of moderate quality and met only two to three quality criteria. Regarding the CanMEDS roles, the Medical Expert role was most frequently represented in the feedback comments, as opposed to the roles Leader and Health Advocate.
Discussion:
The results highlighted that providing high-quality feedback is challenging. To respond to these challenges, it is recommended to set up individual and continuous feedback training.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nursing Evaluation
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process I: Assessment and Diagnosis
The nursing process considers the patient's emotional and physical well-being. The process can be repeated or stopped at any point if judged essential. Assessment is the first step in the nursing...
Methods of Documentation V: CBE
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...

