Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2025

A Complex Diving-For-Food Task to Investigate Social Organization and Interactions in Rats
Published on: May 8, 2021
Equality Restricted: The Problematic Compatibility between Austerity Measures and Human Rights Law
Michael George Marcondes Smith1
1PhD researcher and member of the Law and Development Research Group at the Faculty of Law of the University of Antwerp, Belgium.
Economic policies concentrating wealth harm human rights, especially through austerity measures impacting disadvantaged groups. This paper examines how human rights law’s narrow view of equality allows wealth concentration, neglecting distributive justice.
Area of Science:
- Socioeconomic policy analysis
- Human rights law
- Economic inequality studies
Background:
- Economic policies concentrating wealth often exacerbate socioeconomic inequalities, negatively impacting human rights.
- Austerity measures, like healthcare defunding, disproportionately affect disadvantaged groups, despite being framed as necessary economic choices.
- Current human rights frameworks often sideline human rights as mere guidelines, rather than limits, to such economic policies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically examine how the assumption of justified wealth concentration informs the exclusion of distributive considerations from human rights law.
- To evaluate emerging interpretations of equality beyond legal non-discrimination and equal treatment.
- To explore the potential for equality in human rights law to incorporate a distributive function against wealth concentration policies like austerity.
Main Methods:
- Critical legal analysis of equality within human rights law.
- Examination of economic policy impacts on human rights realization.
- Literature review of emerging interpretations of legal equality and distributive justice.
Main Results:
- The study identifies a problematic conception of equality in human rights law that permits wealth concentration.
- Evidence suggests that current legal interpretations exclude distributive considerations, thereby enabling policies like austerity.
- Emerging interpretations show potential for equality to encompass distributive functions to combat socioeconomic inequalities.
Conclusions:
- Human rights law needs to broaden its conception of equality to include distributive justice to effectively address wealth concentration and austerity.
- Rethinking equality is crucial for ensuring that economic policies do not undermine fundamental human rights standards.
- Integrating distributive considerations into human rights equality frameworks can better protect vulnerable populations from harmful economic policies.
Related Concept Videos
Humanistic Psychology
This approach...
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Fundamental Attribution Error
Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance
Horney's Sociocultural Approach
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

