Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Using leave-one-out cross validation (LOO) in a multilevel regression and poststratification (MRP) workflow: A
Swen Kuh1,2, Lauren Kennedy1,2, Qixuan Chen3
1School of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Leave-one-out cross-validation (LOO) methods like PSIS-LOO may not reliably evaluate multilevel regression and poststratification (MRP) models. These techniques struggle to rank models accurately, especially for small-area estimation, suggesting caution in their application for MRP validation.
Area of Science:
- Statistics
- Computational Statistics
- Survey Methodology
Background:
- Multilevel regression and poststratification (MRP) is increasingly used for population inference.
- Model validity in MRP is crucial but under-researched, particularly regarding validation techniques.
- Assessing the performance of different MRP models is essential for reliable population estimates.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the utility of leave-one-out cross-validation (LOO) for comparing Bayesian models in MRP.
- To investigate two approximate LOO calculations: Pareto smoothed importance sampling (PSIS-LOO) and a survey-weighted version (WTD-PSIS-LOO).
- To assess how accurately these LOO criteria rank models for both population-level and small-area estimation.
Main Methods:
- Utilized two simulation designs to test PSIS-LOO and WTD-PSIS-LOO performance.
- Examined model ranking accuracy for population estimands and small-area estimands.
- Applied the methods to real-world data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).
Main Results:
- Neither PSIS-LOO nor WTD-PSIS-LOO consistently recovered the correct model order for population estimands, though they identified the best and worst models.
- Model performance varied across different small areas, complicating validation for small-area estimation.
- Model ranking showed slight improvement at smaller-area levels when considering different priors.
- Real-world NHANES data analysis corroborated simulation findings, indicating caution with PSIS-LOO for MRP.
Conclusions:
- PSIS-LOO-based model validation may not be fully suitable for evaluating MRP methods due to aggregation effects.
- The aggregation stage in MRP can obscure individual-level prediction errors, impacting LOO performance.
- These findings highlight the need for careful application and potential re-evaluation of LOO techniques in the context of MRP validation.
Related Concept Videos
Multiple Regression
Farmers can use multiple regression to determine the crop yield based on more than one factor, such as water availability, fertilizer, soil properties, etc. Here, the crop yield is the response or dependent variable as it depends on the other independent variables. The analysis requires the construction of a scatter plot...
Stratified Sampling Method
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation
On...
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...

