Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 1, 2026
Using Eye Movements to Evaluate the Cognitive Processes Involved in Text Comprehension
Published on: January 10, 2014
Does the sampling frequency of an eye tracker affect the detection of glaucomatous visual field loss?
Priyanka Maniarasu1, Prathamesh Harshad Shasane1, Vijaya H Pai2
1Department of Optometry, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Purpose:
Evidence suggests that eye movements have potential as a tool for detecting glaucomatous visual field defects. This study evaluated the influence of sampling frequency on eye movement parameters in detecting glaucomatous visual field defects during a free-viewing task.
Methods:
We investigated eye movements in two sets of experiments: (a) young adults with and without simulated visual field defects and (b) glaucoma patients and age-matched controls. In Experiment 1, we recruited 30 healthy volunteers. Among these, 10 performed the task with a gaze-contingent superior arcuate (SARC) scotoma, 10 performed the task with a gaze-contingent biarcuate (BARC) scotoma and 10 performed the task without a simulated scotoma (NoSim). The experimental task involved participants freely exploring 100 images, each for 4 s. Eye movements were recorded using the LiveTrack Lightning eye-tracker (500 Hz). In Experiment 2, we recruited 20 glaucoma patients and 16 age-matched controls. All participants underwent similar experimental tasks as in Experiment 1, except only 37 images were shown for exploration. To analyse the effect of sampling frequency, data were downsampled to 250, 120 and 60 Hz. Eye movement parameters, such as the number of fixations, fixation duration, saccadic amplitude and bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA), were computed across various sampling frequencies.
Results:
Two-way ANOVA revealed no significant effects of sampling frequency on fixation duration (simulation, p = 0.37; glaucoma patients, p = 0.95) and BCEA (simulation, p = 0.84; glaucoma patients: p = 0.91). BCEA showed good distinguishability in differentiating groups across different sampling frequencies, whereas fixation duration failed to distinguish between glaucoma patients and controls. Number of fixations and saccade amplitude showed variations with sampling frequency in both simulations and glaucoma patients.
Conclusion:
In both simulations and glaucoma patients, BCEA consistently differentiated them from controls across various sampling frequencies.
