Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Inductive Reasoning00:59

Inductive Reasoning

60.5K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
60.5K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.2K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.2K
Deductive Reasoning01:16

Deductive Reasoning

55.3K
Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
55.3K
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

1.6K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
1.6K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

3.4K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
3.4K
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

6.1K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
6.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Yizhi Kaiqiao Formula Combined With Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Neurocognitive and Social Outcomes in Preschool Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Developmental neurobiology·2026
Same author

Advancing high-altitude medicine: a model for the future.

Signal transduction and targeted therapy·2026
Same author

<sup>68</sup>Ga-Labeled LLP2A for PET Imaging of Very Late Antigen-4 in Acute Cardiac Rejection.

Molecular pharmaceutics·2026
Same author

Deciphering Object Concepts: Hierarchical Cross-Modal Relational Reasoning for Mining Object-Attribute-Affordance Associations.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
Same author

Validating a gamified size perception task for identifying cognitive profiles in children: a latent profile analysis of executive function and sensory measures.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

DARS2 serves as an independent prognostic factor and participates in multiple biological processes in bladder urothelial carcinoma.

Translational andrology and urology·2026
Same journal

A New Human-Likeness and Comfort Index for Robot Movements Along Prescribed Paths.

IEEE transactions on cybernetics·2026
Same journal

Robust Semiglobal and Global Stabilization for Nonlinear Normal Form Systems by Time-Varying Feedback.

IEEE transactions on cybernetics·2026
Same journal

Adaptive Global Asymptotic Output Stabilization of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems Under Dynamic State/Input Quantization.

IEEE transactions on cybernetics·2026
Same journal

Accelerated Distributed Gradient Tracking for Constrained Aggregative Optimization Over Time-Varying Digraphs.

IEEE transactions on cybernetics·2026
Same journal

Small-Gain-Based Plug-and-Play Distributed Control Framework for DC Microgrids With Decentralized Reconfiguration.

IEEE transactions on cybernetics·2026
Same journal

Prescribed-Time Impulsive Control of High-Order Integrator Systems.

IEEE transactions on cybernetics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 7, 2025

Combining Eye-tracking Data with an Analysis of Video Content from Free-viewing a Video of a Walk in an Urban Park Environment
08:25

Combining Eye-tracking Data with an Analysis of Video Content from Free-viewing a Video of a Walk in an Urban Park Environment

Published on: May 7, 2019

9.0K

Robust Commonsense Reasoning Against Noisy Labels Using Adaptive Correction.

Xu Yang, Cheng Deng, Kun Wei

    IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics
    |December 27, 2023
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study introduces a novel method to improve commonsense reasoning by addressing noisy labels in training data. The approach enhances model robustness and overall performance on challenging question-answering tasks.

    More Related Videos

    Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms
    07:31

    Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

    Published on: February 8, 2019

    6.6K
    Using the Visual World Paradigm to Study Sentence Comprehension in Mandarin-Speaking Children with Autism
    06:15

    Using the Visual World Paradigm to Study Sentence Comprehension in Mandarin-Speaking Children with Autism

    Published on: October 3, 2018

    7.8K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jul 7, 2025

    Combining Eye-tracking Data with an Analysis of Video Content from Free-viewing a Video of a Walk in an Urban Park Environment
    08:25

    Combining Eye-tracking Data with an Analysis of Video Content from Free-viewing a Video of a Walk in an Urban Park Environment

    Published on: May 7, 2019

    9.0K
    Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms
    07:31

    Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

    Published on: February 8, 2019

    6.6K
    Using the Visual World Paradigm to Study Sentence Comprehension in Mandarin-Speaking Children with Autism
    06:15

    Using the Visual World Paradigm to Study Sentence Comprehension in Mandarin-Speaking Children with Autism

    Published on: October 3, 2018

    7.8K

    Area of Science:

    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Natural Language Processing
    • Machine Learning

    Background:

    • Commonsense reasoning using knowledge graphs (KGs) is crucial for AI but is hindered by unrealistic assumptions of clean training data.
    • Existing methods lack robustness to label noise, a common issue in real-world datasets, limiting practical applications.
    • The challenge of commonsense reasoning with mislabeled training samples remains largely unexplored.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To develop a robust method for commonsense reasoning that effectively handles mislabeled training samples.
    • To enhance the practical applicability of commonsense reasoning models by improving their resilience to label noise.
    • To provide a generally applicable framework for boosting the robustness of existing commonsense reasoning approaches.

    Main Methods:

    • Constructed diverse knowledge and model augmentations.
    • Developed a multiple-choice alignment method to categorize training samples into clean, semi-clean, and unclean sets.
    • Designed adaptive label correction techniques for semi-clean and unclean samples to leverage noisy information.

    Main Results:

    • The proposed method significantly enhances robustness against label noise in commonsense reasoning.
    • Overall performance on commonsense reasoning benchmarks (CommonsenseQA, OpenbookQA) was substantially improved.
    • The approach demonstrated general applicability across multiple existing commonsense reasoning frameworks.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed method effectively addresses the critical issue of noisy labels in commonsense reasoning.
    • This work offers a practical solution for building more reliable AI systems capable of understanding and reasoning with real-world data.
    • The findings pave the way for more robust and performant AI in complex reasoning tasks.