Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Temporal processing in deaf signers.

H Poizner, P Tallal

    Brain and Language
    |January 1, 1987
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Congenitally deaf signers do not have diminished visual temporal processing abilities compared to hearing individuals. This research indicates that language experience, not sensory modality, shapes rapid temporal analysis skills.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    A new chemotherapeutic investigation: Piracetam effects on dyslexia.

    Annals of dyslexia·2013
    Same author

    Four-year follow-up study of language impaired children.

    Annals of dyslexia·2013
    Same author

    Parkinson's disease patients show impaired corrective grasp control and eye-hand coupling when reaching to grasp virtual objects.

    Neuroscience·2013
    Same author

    The neurobiology of sensory and language processing in language-impaired children.

    Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
    Same author

    PET Studies of Auditory and Phonological Processing: Effects of Stimulus Characteristics and Task Demands.

    Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
    Same author

    Reaching to proprioceptively defined targets in Parkinson's disease: effects of deep brain stimulation therapy.

    Neuroscience·2013
    Same journal

    Effects of semantic distance and metaphorical constituent position on L2 noun-noun metaphor processing: an ERP study.

    Brain and language·2026
    Same journal

    Cortical tracking of natural speech by children with developmental language disorder (DLD): An EEG speech decoding investigation.

    Brain and language·2026
    Same journal

    Inhibitory states modulate the processing of negated concepts in existential sentences. Evidence from ERPs.

    Brain and language·2026
    Same journal

    The interplay between attentional control and language task schemas: Progressive adaptation of attentional control in interpreting.

    Brain and language·2026
    Same journal

    You again? 14-month-olds show neural signatures of lexical-semantic activation for novel instead of familiar voices.

    Brain and language·2026
    Same journal

    Five-year-old children engage temporal but not frontal mechanisms during morphosyntactic processing of sentences.

    Brain and language·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Neuroscience
    • Psychology
    • Linguistics

    Background:

    • Auditory and visual modalities possess distinct temporal processing capabilities.
    • Speech requires faster temporal contrasts than sign language, suggesting potential differences in sensory experience.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate whether congenitally deaf signers exhibit altered abilities in processing rapid visual signals.
    • To compare temporal analysis capacities across sensation, perception, and memory levels between deaf signers and hearing individuals.

    Main Methods:

    • Four experiments assessed rapid temporal analysis in deaf signers and hearing controls.
    • Methods included measuring critical flicker frequency and two-point thresholds.
    • Perception and memory for temporal order of visual stimuli were also evaluated.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • No significant differences in rapid temporal analysis were observed between deaf signers and hearing subjects at any tested level.
    • Findings contrast with some previous studies on sensory deprivation.

    Conclusions:

    • Congenitally deaf signers do not possess diminished capacities for rapid visual temporal analysis compared to hearing individuals.
    • Deficits in temporal analysis seen in developmental language delay are unlikely due to a lack of speech experience.