Thrombosed external hemorrhoids during pregnancy: surgery versus conservative treatment

The management of thrombosed external hemorrhoids (TEH) during pregnancy is still under debate because of the fear of potential adverse effects on the fetus. This study aims to compare efficacy and safety of conservative versus surgical treatment of acute TEH in pregnant women. Furthermore, the outcome of two different surgical approaches was evaluated. This is a prospective observational study including a sub-analysis on two randomized groups of pregnant women affected by TEH. The primary outcome measured was the impact of conservative and surgical treatment defined in terms of VAS, clinical patient grading assessment scale (CPGAS) and the SF-12 questionnaire. In a randomized sub-analysis of the surgical treatment, the outcome of local excision (LE) versus thrombectomy (TE) was compared. Fifty-three patients entered the study. Twenty-six patients had conservative treatment and 22 underwent surgery. Within the surgical group, 8 were randomized for TE and 14 for LE. VAS, SF-12 and CPGAS improved in both groups after 3 and 10 days from the treatment. However, physical (PCS) and mental health (MCS) domains of the SF-12 and CPGAS showed a significant difference in favor of surgery on the 10th day (PCS: p < 0.002 and MCS: p = 0.03; CPGAS: p = 0.002). The surgical group showed an earlier significant reduction of pain on the 3rd day (p = 0.0004). In the surgical group, randomization was halted due to ethical concerns arising from a notable difference in the primary end point between subgroups during interim analysis. Specifically, the re-thrombosis rate was 38% (3/8) after TE and 7% (1/14) after LE. No complications occurred for either mothers or fetuses. Both surgical and conservative treatments are safe and effective. However, surgery allows a faster relief of anal pain. Thrombectomy is associated with higher risk of re-thrombosis when compared to local excision (clinicaltrials.gov ID number NCT04588467).