Quantifying Disparities in Air Pollution Exposures across the United States Using Home and Work Addresses
Priyanka de Souza1,2,3, Susan Anenberg4, Carrie Makarewicz1
1Department of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado 80202, United States.
Considering where people work, not just live, reveals greater air pollution exposure disparities, especially for nonwhite and less educated workers. Ignoring workplace exposure leads to underestimating these health risks.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Health
- Epidemiology
- Occupational Health
Background:
- Human mobility significantly influences ambient air pollution exposure and associated health risks.
- Previous research predominantly relied on residential location, potentially underestimating true exposures.
- Understanding exposure disparities requires integrating diverse human mobility patterns.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how incorporating both workplace and residential locations impacts the assessment of air pollution exposure disparities.
- To quantify the underestimation of disparities when only residential location is considered.
- To identify subpopulations with the highest exposure misclassification.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a large-scale database of US workers (128-144 million) and ambient particulate matter (PM2.5) data (2011-2018).
- Compared air pollution exposures based on residential location versus a combined home-and-workplace exposure model.
- Analyzed disparities across various demographic and socioeconomic factors.
Main Results:
- Workplace exposures were generally higher than residential exposures.
- Nonwhite and less educated workers experienced increased PM2.5 exposures compared to the national average.
- Disparities in workplace exposure were more pronounced for racial/ethnic groups and job types than for income, education, age, or sex.
- Excluding workplace exposures led to systematic underestimation of disparities.
Conclusions:
- Incorporating workplace location is crucial for accurately assessing air pollution exposure disparities.
- Failure to account for workplace exposures can mask significant health risks for vulnerable subpopulations.
- Exposure misclassification was highest among urban, younger populations, impacting PM2.5 and health impact associations.
More Related Videos
05:18Measuring Carbon Content in Airway Macrophages Exposed to Carbon-Containing Particulate Matters
Published on: July 12, 2024
12:15Quantification of three DNA Lesions by Mass Spectrometry and Assessment of Their Levels in Tissues of Mice Exposed to Ambient Fine Particulate Matter
Published on: May 29, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Sampling Plans
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Stratified Sampling Method
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...
