Toxicity Spectrum of Anti-GD2 Immunotherapy: A Real-World Study Leveraging the US Food and Drug Administration
Guangfei Wang1, Jinglin Wang2, Ruxiang Du3
1Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, 201102, China.
Background:
Anti-disialoganglioside (anti-GD2) monoclonal antibodies are effective immunotherapeutic drugs for treating neuroblastoma, yet their toxicity spectrum is unclear.
Objective:
This study aimed to assess the toxicity profiles of three anti-GD2 monoclonal antibodies (dinutuximab, dinutuximab β, and naxitamab) in clinical applications by mining and evaluating the adverse drug reaction (ADR) signals from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System.
Methods:
Data in the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System from the time anti-GD2 monoclonal antibodies became available in the market to the first quarter of 2023 were searched. The signals of anti-GD2 monoclonal antibody-associated ADRs were quantified using four types of algorithms, including the reporting odds ratio, the proportional reporting ratio, the combination of the proportional reporting ratio and χ2 statistic method used by the UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, and the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network. The ADRs were categorized by System Organ Class based on the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities, and were sorted according to the frequency and signal strength of ADRs.
Results:
A total of 370 adverse drug event reports with anti-GD2 monoclonal antibodies listed as the 'primary suspected drugs' were identified, with 116 ADR signals detected, of which 22 were not in the drug labels. Among the adverse drug event reports, 276 reports concerned dinutuximab/dinutuximab β as primary suspected drugs with 90 ADR signals, involving 19 System Organ Classes, of which 21 signals were not in the label; 94 adverse drug event reports concerned naxitamab as the primary suspected drug with 26 ADR signals, involving 11 System Organ Classes, of which one was not in the label. For dinutuximab/dinutuximab β-related ADRs, the top five most frequent were "fever", "abdominal pain", "elevated aspartate aminotransferase (AST)", "elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT)" and "hypotension"; the top five most intensive signals were "hypoalbuminemia", "elevated AST", "capillary leakage syndrome", "hypoxia" and "elevated ALT". For naxitamab-related ADRs, the top five most frequent were "hypotension", "pain", "urticarial", "hypertension" and "rash"; the top five most intensive signals were "hypotension", "urticaria", "hypoxemia", "bronchospasm" and "hypertension". Involved System Organ Classes included "investigations" and "respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders" containing the most types of ADR signals in dinutuximab/dintuximab β-related ADRs and naxitamab-related ADRs, respectively.
Conclusions:
Our study comprehensively analyzed the toxicity profiles of anti-GD2 monoclonal antibodies and provides an important reference for clinical monitoring and ADR identification of these drugs.
Insights
This study analyzed adverse drug reactions for anti-disialoganglioside (anti-GD2) monoclonal antibodies, revealing new toxicity signals not listed on drug labels. Findings offer crucial insights for monitoring neuroblastoma immunotherapies.
Area of Science:
- Immunotherapy
- Pharmacovigilance
- Oncology
Background:
- Anti-disialoganglioside (anti-GD2) monoclonal antibodies are key immunotherapies for neuroblastoma.
- The complete toxicity spectrum of these effective drugs requires further elucidation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the toxicity profiles of dinutuximab, dinutuximab β, and naxitamab.
- To identify and evaluate adverse drug reaction (ADR) signals from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).
Main Methods:
- Analyzed FAERS data from drug market release to Q1 2023.
- Quantified ADR signals using four distinct algorithms (ROR, PRR, PRR+χ², BCNN).
- Categorized ADRs by System Organ Class (MedDRA) and ranked by frequency and signal strength.
Main Results:
- Identified 116 ADR signals for anti-GD2 antibodies, with 22 not previously labeled.
- Dinutuximab/dinutuximab β showed frequent ADRs like fever and abdominal pain; intensive signals included hypoalbuminemia and capillary leakage syndrome.
- Naxitamab exhibited frequent ADRs such as hypotension and rash; intensive signals included hypotension and urticaria.
Conclusions:
- Comprehensive analysis of anti-GD2 monoclonal antibody toxicity profiles.
- Provides critical data for clinical monitoring and ADR identification of these neuroblastoma treatments.
More Related Videos
06:08Assessment of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell-Associated Toxicities Using an Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patient-Derived Xenograft Mouse Model
Published on: February 10, 2023
06:37Using Reference Reagents to Confirm Robustness of Cytokine Release Assays for the Prediction of Monoclonal Antibody Safety
Published on: September 15, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Prevention of Further Absorption of Poison
Toxic Reactions: Overview
Toxicity falls into two primary categories: local and systemic.
Local toxicity appears at the exposure site, such as protein denaturation caused by caustic substances.
In contrast, systemic toxicity requires the toxic agent's absorption and distribution,...
