Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Psychosurgery01:30

Psychosurgery

56
Psychosurgery, the surgical alteration or permanent removal of brain tissue to alleviate severe psychological conditions, stands as one of the most radical and controversial treatments in the history of mental health care. Its development and application have evolved significantly, marked by dramatic shifts in scientific understanding and ethical perspectives.
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...
56

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Conscience Clause Laws Already Permit Secular Hospitals to Withhold or Withdraw Life-Sustaining Treatment over Surrogate Objections.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026
Same author

Local dispersal and growth in an island population of Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in South Carolina.

Environmental entomology·2026
Same author

Sexual and Gender Minorities in Organ and Tissue Donation and Transplantation (OTDT): A Survey of Canadian OTDT Health Care Workers.

Canadian journal of kidney health and disease·2026
Same author

Addressing 'futility' in psychiatry: a consensus statement.

Psychological medicine·2026
Same author

Brain Death: Five Mandates to Continue Technologic Support After Death.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026
Same author

Mental health advance planning documents: complexities and considerations.

Irish journal of psychological medicine·2025
Same journal

Ethics briefing.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Medical ethics and categorisation.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Suspension or prioritisation? Exploring the ethics of age-based rationing in adult ADHD services.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Ethics of not knowing who we are talking to in qualitative research.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Suicide is not a public health issue and perhaps very few things should be.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Normalising transparency: an argument for requiring generative AI use declarations in all manuscripts-with a call for commentaries.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 6, 2025

Brain Death Induction in Mice Using Intra-Arterial Blood Pressure Monitoring and Ventilation via Tracheostomy
05:03

Brain Death Induction in Mice Using Intra-Arterial Blood Pressure Monitoring and Ventilation via Tracheostomy

Published on: April 17, 2020

5.6K

No consent for brain death testing.

Thaddeus Mason Pope1, Alexander Ruck Keene2,3, Jennifer Chandler4

  • 1Mitchell Hamline School of Law, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA thaddeus.pope@mitchellhamline.edu.

Journal of Medical Ethics
|December 28, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Consent is generally not required for brain death testing in the USA and Canada. In England and Wales, while consent may be a prima facie duty, its absence has not prevented testing, with courts questioning the necessity of parental consent.

Keywords:
DeathDecision MakingEthics- MedicalLegislationParental Consent

More Related Videos

Abbiategrasso Brain Bank Protocol for Collecting, Processing and Characterizing Aging Brains
12:28

Abbiategrasso Brain Bank Protocol for Collecting, Processing and Characterizing Aging Brains

Published on: June 3, 2020

17.4K
Study of Experimental Organ Donation Models for Lung Transplantation
08:56

Study of Experimental Organ Donation Models for Lung Transplantation

Published on: March 15, 2024

1.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 6, 2025

Brain Death Induction in Mice Using Intra-Arterial Blood Pressure Monitoring and Ventilation via Tracheostomy
05:03

Brain Death Induction in Mice Using Intra-Arterial Blood Pressure Monitoring and Ventilation via Tracheostomy

Published on: April 17, 2020

5.6K
Abbiategrasso Brain Bank Protocol for Collecting, Processing and Characterizing Aging Brains
12:28

Abbiategrasso Brain Bank Protocol for Collecting, Processing and Characterizing Aging Brains

Published on: June 3, 2020

17.4K
Study of Experimental Organ Donation Models for Lung Transplantation
08:56

Study of Experimental Organ Donation Models for Lung Transplantation

Published on: March 15, 2024

1.7K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Law
  • Neurology
  • Bioethics

Background:

  • Determining brain death is critical for end-of-life care and organ donation.
  • Legal frameworks surrounding consent for medical procedures vary internationally.
  • Previous legal precedents have established guidelines for brain death determination.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the legal requirement of consent for brain death testing in the USA, Canada, and England/Wales.
  • To examine recent court cases concerning consent and brain death evaluations.
  • To clarify the legal standing of parental consent in pediatric brain death assessments.

Main Methods:

  • Review of legal statutes and case law in the USA, Canada, and England/Wales.
  • Analysis of judicial decisions pertaining to brain death testing and consent.
  • Comparative legal analysis of differing jurisdictional approaches.

Main Results:

  • In the USA and Canada, legal consensus indicates consent is not mandatory for brain death testing.
  • In England and Wales, a prima facie duty to seek consent exists, but its absence has not legally barred testing.
  • Recent English court cases demonstrate a trend where lack of consent was not a decisive factor, and the need for parental consent was questioned.

Conclusions:

  • Legal requirements for consent to brain death testing differ significantly across jurisdictions.
  • Judicial interpretation increasingly supports the performance of brain death testing even without explicit consent.
  • The necessity of parental consent for pediatric brain death testing is subject to judicial scrutiny and may not always be required.