Positivity of repeat nasal MRSA PCR screening: a single-center experience

Ali Earl1, Sage Greenlee1, Karen Fong1

  • 1Department of Pharmacy, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Insights

Repeating nasal methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) within 14 days is often unnecessary. Our study found negative-to-positive MRSA PCR conversion is uncommon during a single inpatient stay, suggesting limited clinical benefit.

Area of Science:

  • Infectious Diseases
  • Clinical Microbiology
  • Healthcare Epidemiology

Background:

  • Nasal methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization is a significant concern in healthcare settings.
  • Repeat screening for MRSA using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is common practice.
  • The clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of serial MRSA PCR testing within a single admission are debated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the frequency of conversion from negative to positive nasal MRSA PCR results within a 14-day period during a single inpatient admission.
  • To assess the potential impact of repeat MRSA PCR testing on healthcare costs and antibiotic stewardship.
  • To determine if repeat MRSA screening provides additional benefit beyond initial testing.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective, single-center study design.
  • Analysis of inpatient data including serial nasal MRSA PCR results within 14 days.
  • Calculation of the conversion rate from negative to positive MRSA PCR results.

Main Results:

  • Conversion from a negative to a positive nasal MRSA PCR result during a single inpatient admission was uncommon.
  • The observed conversion rate was 2% in the evaluated patient cohort.
  • This low conversion rate suggests limited benefit from repeat MRSA PCR testing within this timeframe.

Conclusions:

  • Repeat nasal MRSA PCR testing within 14 days of initial screening during an inpatient admission is infrequently associated with a change in MRSA status.
  • The low conversion rate questions the routine use and cost-effectiveness of serial MRSA PCR screening in this context.
  • Findings support a re-evaluation of current guidelines regarding repeat MRSA PCR testing to optimize resource utilization and antibiotic stewardship.