Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Minimally Invasive Transverse Aortic Constriction in Mice
Published on: March 14, 2017
Male-Female Differences in Acute Type B Aortic Dissection
Frederike Meccanici1, Carlijn G E Thijssen1,2, Robin H Heijmen3
1Department of Cardiology Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam Netherlands.
Insights
This study found no sex differences in outcomes for acute type B aortic dissection (aortic dissection type B). Despite differing clinical presentations, male and female patients experienced similar survival rates and morbidity.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Vascular Surgery
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Acute type B aortic dissection is a life-threatening cardiovascular emergency.
- Existing research on sex-based differences in type B aortic dissection is limited.
- Understanding these differences is crucial for effective patient management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate male-female differences in the clinical presentation, management, and outcomes of acute type B aortic dissection.
- To identify potential disparities in morbidity and mortality between sexes.
- To inform future research and clinical practice regarding sex-specific considerations.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective cohort study included 384 patients with acute type B aortic dissection from 2007-2017 across four tertiary hospitals.
- Data were collected via patient files and questionnaires, with a median follow-up of 6.1 years.
- Statistical analyses compared clinical characteristics, treatment choices, and survival rates between male and female patients.
Main Results:
- Women presented older and with less frequent distal dissections or malperfusion compared to men.
- While absolute aortic diameters were smaller in women, indexed diameters were larger.
- No significant differences were observed in early or 5-year mortality rates, or in late reinterventions between sexes.
Conclusions:
- Despite distinct clinical profiles at presentation, acute type B aortic dissection management and outcomes (mortality, morbidity) do not differ significantly between men and women.
- Further research is needed to explore the impact of age and specific interventions on outcomes.
- These findings suggest a need for tailored approaches considering individual patient factors rather than solely sex-based generalizations.
Background:
Acute type B aortic dissection is a cardiovascular emergency with considerable mortality and morbidity risk. Male-female differences have been observed in cardiovascular disease; however, literature on type B aortic dissection is scarce.
Methods And Results:
A retrospective cohort study was conducted including all consecutive patients with acute type B aortic dissection between 2007 and 2017 in 4 tertiary hospitals using patient files and questionnaires for late morbidity. In total, 384 patients were included with a follow-up of 6.1 (range, 0.02-14.8) years, of which 41% (n=156) were female. Women presented at an older age than men (67 [interquartile range (IQR), 57-73] versus 62 [IQR, 52-71]; P=0.015). Prior abdominal aortic aneurysm (6% versus 15%; P=0.009), distally extending dissections (71 versus 85%; P=0.001), and clinical malperfusion (18% versus 32%; P=0.002) were less frequently observed in women. Absolute maximal descending aortic diameters were smaller in women (36 [IQR: 33-40] mm versus 39 [IQR, 36-43] mm; P<0.001), while indexed for body surface area diameters were larger in women (20 [IQR, 18-23] mm/m2 versus 19 [IQR, 17-21] mm/m2). No male-female differences were found in treatment choice; however, indications for invasive treatment were different (P<0.001). Early mortality rate was 9.6% in women and 11.8% in men (P=0.60). The 5-year survival was 83% (95% CI, 77-89) for women and 84% (95% CI, 79-89) for men (P=0.90). No male-female differences were observed in late (re)interventions.
Conclusions:
No male-female differences were found in management, early or late death, and morbidity in patients presenting with acute type B aortic dissection, despite distinct clinical profiles at presentation. More details on the impact of age and type of intervention are warranted in future studies.
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aneurysm I: Introduction
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management

