Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Conservation of Protein Domains Over Different Proteins02:26

Conservation of Protein Domains Over Different Proteins

10.9K
Protein domains are small structurally independent units that are part of a single amino acid chain.  Although these domains are often structurally independent, they may rely on synergistic effects to perform their functions as part of a larger protein. Protein domains may be conserved within the same organism, as well as across different organisms.
A limited set of protein domains often duplicate and recombine during evolution. These domains can be organized in different combinations to...
10.9K
Protein Organization01:13

Protein Organization

137.9K
Overview
137.9K
Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

4.2K
Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
4.2K
Protein Families02:47

Protein Families

15.3K
Protein families are groups of homologous proteins; that is, they have similarities in amino acid sequences and three-dimensional structures. Protein families usually occur because of gene duplication, where an additional copy of a gene is inserted into the genome of an organism.   Mutations that change the amino acids but still allow the protein to be properly synthesized, will lead to new protein family members.   If these new proteins contain similar amino acids in key...
15.3K
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons02:54

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

5.7K
Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
5.7K
Conservation of Protein Domains02:26

Conservation of Protein Domains

3.1K
3.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Enhancing functional proteins through multimodal inverse folding with ABACUS-T.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Designing flexible protein structures and sampling protein conformations with a unified model using vector quantization and diffusion.

National science review·2025
Same author

Publisher Correction: Rotamer-free protein sequence design based on deep learning and self-consistency.

Nature computational science·2024
Same author

Rotamer-free protein sequence design based on deep learning and self-consistency.

Nature computational science·2024
Same author

Long non-coding RNA DSCAM-AS1 promotes the progression of gastric cancer via targeting miR-101-3p.

Panminerva medica·2019
Same author

A simultaneous grafting/vinyl polymerization process generates a polycationic surface for enhanced antibacterial activity of bacterial cellulose.

International journal of biological macromolecules·2019
Same journal

Combining bacterial display and protein language models to engineer a CD69-binding affibody for molecular imaging of immune activation.

Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS·2026
Same journal

Examining selection dynamics and limitations in multi-round protein selection of high diversity libraries.

Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS·2026
Same journal

A photo-enhanced oxidative coupling for site-specific protein Labeling via noncanonical amino acid incorporation.

Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS·2026
Same journal

Engineering affibody domains as anti-idiotypic masks for nivolumab-based prodrugs.

Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS·2026
Same journal

Integrating machine learning tools in protein design: a case of MHETase engineering for PET biodeconstruction.

Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS·2026
Same journal

Computational redesign of a thermostable T7 RNA polymerase.

Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 6, 2025

A Virtual Machine Platform for Non-Computer Professionals for Using Deep Learning to Classify Biological Sequences of Metagenomic Data
09:34

A Virtual Machine Platform for Non-Computer Professionals for Using Deep Learning to Classify Biological Sequences of Metagenomic Data

Published on: September 25, 2021

4.0K

Protein sequence design on given backbones with deep learning.

Yufeng Liu1, Haiyan Liu1,2,3

  • 1MOE Key Laboratory for Membraneless Organelles and Cellular Dynamics, School of Life Sciences, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230027, China.

Protein Engineering, Design & Selection : PEDS
|December 29, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Deep learning for protein design models amino acid sequences for foldable proteins. Current computational metrics for evaluating these protein design methods need experimental validation.

Keywords:
computational protein designde novo protein designinverse folding

More Related Videos

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.1K
Investigating Protein Sequence-structure-dynamics Relationships with Bio3D-web
09:51

Investigating Protein Sequence-structure-dynamics Relationships with Bio3D-web

Published on: July 16, 2017

15.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 6, 2025

A Virtual Machine Platform for Non-Computer Professionals for Using Deep Learning to Classify Biological Sequences of Metagenomic Data
09:34

A Virtual Machine Platform for Non-Computer Professionals for Using Deep Learning to Classify Biological Sequences of Metagenomic Data

Published on: September 25, 2021

4.0K
Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.1K
Investigating Protein Sequence-structure-dynamics Relationships with Bio3D-web
09:51

Investigating Protein Sequence-structure-dynamics Relationships with Bio3D-web

Published on: July 16, 2017

15.5K

Area of Science:

  • Computational biology
  • Protein engineering
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Deep learning models protein sequence design by sampling amino acid distributions based on backbone structure.
  • Physically foldable protein sequences require proper consideration of inter-residue couplings, addressed explicitly in iterative or autoregressive methods.
  • Non-autoregressive models offer computational efficiency but require experimental validation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the current state of computational metrics used for protein sequence design.
  • To highlight the limitations of existing metrics and the need for experimental validation.
  • To encourage the use of wet experiments for validating deep learning-based protein design methods.

Main Methods:

  • Review of deep learning approaches for protein sequence design, including iterative, autoregressive, and non-autoregressive models.
  • Analysis of current evaluation metrics such as native sequence recovery rate and native sequence perplexity.
  • Discussion of complementary metrics like sequence-structure compatibility derived from energy calculations or structure prediction.

Main Results:

  • Existing computational metrics for protein design have limitations that may not accurately predict real-world performance.
  • Non-autoregressive models, while efficient, have not yet been sufficiently validated by experimental testing.
  • Native sequence recovery and perplexity are common but potentially insufficient metrics for assessing design success.

Conclusions:

  • Computational metrics for protein design require further development and validation.
  • Experimental validation through wet experiments is crucial for assessing the true performance of protein design methods.
  • A combination of computational and experimental approaches is necessary for robust protein sequence design.