Shared and distinctive dysconnectivity patterns underlying pure generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and comorbid GAD...

The resting-state connectivity features underlying pure generalized anxiety disorder (GAD, G1) and comorbid GAD and depressive symptoms (G2) have not been directly compared. Furthermore, it is unclear whether these features might serve as potential prognostic biomarkers and change with treatment. Degree centrality (DC) in G1 (40 subjects), G2 (58 subjects), and healthy controls (HCs, 54 subjects) was compared before treatment, and the DC of G1 or G2 at baseline was compared with that after 4 weeks of paroxetine treatment. Using support vector regression (SVR), voxel-wise DC across the entire brain and abnormal DC at baseline were employed to predict treatment response. At baseline, G1 and G2 exhibited lower DC in the left mid-cingulate cortex and vermis IV/V compared to HCs. Additionally, compared to HCs, G1 had lower DC in the left middle temporal gyrus, while G2 showed higher DC in the right inferior temporal/fusiform gyrus. However, there was no significant difference in DC between G1 and G2. The SVR based on abnormal DC at baseline could successfully predict treatment response in responders in G2 or in G1 and G2. Notably, the predictive performance based on abnormal DC at baseline surpassed that based on DC across the entire brain. After treatment, G2 responders showed lower DC in the right medial orbital frontal gyrus, while no change in DC was identified in G1 responders. The G1 and G2 showed common and distinct dysconnectivity patterns and they could potentially serve as prognostic biomarkers. Furthermore, DC in patients with GAD could change with treatment.