Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II01:19

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II

377
In gas chromatography, different detectors are employed to meet specific analytical needs. These detectors are often categorized based on their detection mechanisms and the types of compounds they are best suited to analyze. Thermal Conductivity Detectors (TCD), Flame Ionization Detectors (FID), and Electron Capture Detectors (ECD) represent common categories, each with unique operating principles and applications. However, beyond these, several other detectors are designed for more specialized...
377
Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Interference01:30

Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Interference

196
In atomic emission spectroscopy (AES), high-temperature atomizers excite a broad range of elements and molecules that generate complex emissions from sources such as oxides, hydroxides, and flame combustion products in the flame or plasma. Several strategies can be employed to minimize spectral interferences caused by overlapping emission lines or bands. These include increasing instrument resolution, choosing alternative emission lines, optimally placing the detector in low-background regions,...
196
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I01:21

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I

428
There are different types of detectors used in gas chromatography, each with its own specific properties that make it suitable for detecting certain types of analytes. The most commonly used detectors in GC are thermal conductivity detector (TCD), flame ionization detector (FID), and electron capture detector (ECD).
TCD is the earliest and most widely used detector that operates by measuring the changes in the thermal conductivity of the carrier gas. When a sample compound enters the detector,...
428
Electronic Distance Measuring Instruments01:30

Electronic Distance Measuring Instruments

37
Electronic Distance Measuring Instruments (EDMs) are essential tools in modern surveying, offering precise distance measurements by emitting electromagnetic signals and calculating the time required for these signals to travel to a target and return. Two primary types of signals are used in EDMs — light waves and microwaves — each suited to specific environmental and distance requirements. Light-wave-based EDMs utilize either infrared or laser light, providing high accuracy over short...
37
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Atomization Methods01:25

Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Atomization Methods

522
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS) atomizes samples through flame atomization or electrothermal atomization. Flame atomization typically involves a nebulizer and spray chamber assembly to combine the sample with a fuel–oxidant mixture, creating a fine aerosol mist that enters a burner. Typically, the fuel and oxidant are combined in an approximately stoichiometric ratio. However, for atoms that are easily oxidized, a fuel-rich mixture may be more advantageous. Only about 5% of the...
522
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Interference01:25

Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Interference

772
Interference leads to systematic error in atomic absorption (AA) measurements by enhancing or diminishing the analytical signal or the background. These interferences can be grouped into three main categories: spectral interference, chemical interference, and physical interference.
Spectral interference occurs when signals from other elements or molecules overlap with the analyte signal, falsely elevating or masking the analyte's absorbance. This interference can be corrected using Zeeman,...
772

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mineralization of Trifluoromethanesulfonate via Subcritical Hydrothermal Reaction: Reaction Mechanism and Transformation Pathways.

Environmental science & technology·2026
Same author

Movement, residency, and behavioral plasticity of reef manta rays in the Samarai Islands of Papua New Guinea.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Noble gas diffusion in tuff: Effects of temperature and pressure investigated with a modified time-lag method.

Journal of environmental radioactivity·2026
Same author

Ambient Ion Focusing from a Field-Free Region to a Detector: Enhanced Signal for Explosives and Drug Detection with Mass Spectrometry.

Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry·2026
Same author

Design, development, and preliminary evaluation of a 3D-printed high-volume vapor sampler for field collection of improvised explosives.

Talanta·2026
Same author

Using low-cost sensors and GPS to assess spatiotemporal variations in personal exposure to PM<sub>2.5</sub> in the Washington State Twin Registry.

Environmental research·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 6, 2025

Quantitative Detection of Trace Explosive Vapors by Programmed Temperature Desorption Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector
07:57

Quantitative Detection of Trace Explosive Vapors by Programmed Temperature Desorption Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector

Published on: July 25, 2014

20.0K

Standoff trace explosives vapor detection at meter distances.

Megan K Nims1, Elizabeth H Denis2, Garret L Hart1

  • 1Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 902 Battelle Boulevard, P.O. Box 999, MSIN P7-50, Richland, WA 99352, USA.

Talanta
|December 30, 2023
PubMed
Summary

This study shows that atmospheric flow tube-mass spectrometry (AFT-MS) can detect trace explosives vapor at meters away. This noncontact method offers a less invasive approach to security screening.

Keywords:
Atmospheric flow tube-mass spectrometryExplosivesNoncontact samplingRDXStandoff detectionVapor detection

More Related Videos

Standardized Method for Measuring Collection Efficiency from Wipe-sampling of Trace Explosives
07:22

Standardized Method for Measuring Collection Efficiency from Wipe-sampling of Trace Explosives

Published on: April 10, 2017

9.6K
Research and Development of High-performance Explosives
10:33

Research and Development of High-performance Explosives

Published on: February 20, 2016

17.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 6, 2025

Quantitative Detection of Trace Explosive Vapors by Programmed Temperature Desorption Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector
07:57

Quantitative Detection of Trace Explosive Vapors by Programmed Temperature Desorption Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector

Published on: July 25, 2014

20.0K
Standardized Method for Measuring Collection Efficiency from Wipe-sampling of Trace Explosives
07:22

Standardized Method for Measuring Collection Efficiency from Wipe-sampling of Trace Explosives

Published on: April 10, 2017

9.6K
Research and Development of High-performance Explosives
10:33

Research and Development of High-performance Explosives

Published on: February 20, 2016

17.6K

Area of Science:

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Chemical Engineering
  • Forensic Science

Background:

  • Explosives vapor detection is crucial for security but challenging due to low vapor concentrations.
  • Current methods like physical swiping are invasive and may miss trace amounts.
  • Noncontact vapor detection offers a less invasive and potentially more sensitive alternative.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate the capability of atmospheric flow tube-mass spectrometry (AFT-MS) for standoff detection of trace explosives vapor.
  • To evaluate the sensitivity and standoff distances achievable with AFT-MS combined with a high-volume air sampler.
  • To explore the potential applications of this technology in security screening.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized atmospheric flow tube-mass spectrometry (AFT-MS) with a high-volume air sampler.
  • Performed standoff detection experiments with explosives vapor sources (RDX, nitroglycerin residue).
  • Investigated detection capabilities at various distances and relative to air currents.

Main Results:

  • Achieved parts-per-quadrillion sensitivity for explosives vapor detection.
  • Demonstrated standoff detection of RDX vapor up to 2.5 meters and residue vapors up to 0.5 meters.
  • Confirmed successful detection both upstream and downstream of the vapor source, irrespective of room air currents.

Conclusions:

  • AFT-MS with a high-volume sampler enables effective standoff detection of trace explosives vapor.
  • The technology offers a sensitive, noncontact method for explosives screening.
  • Potential applications include security screening at mail facilities, border crossings, and checkpoints for explosives, drugs, and chemical threats.