Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 27, 2026
Microarray-based Identification of Individual HERV Loci Expression: Application to Biomarker Discovery in Prostate Cancer
Published on: November 2, 2013
Cost analysis of next-generation imaging in high-risk prostate cancer staging
J J Szczesniewski1, C Tellez Fouz2, A García Tello2
1Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Getafe, Madrid, Spain; Departamento de Cirugía, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Introduction And Objective:
Next-generation imaging (NGI) tests, such as choline PET/CT and PSMA PET, have shown to increase sensitivity in the detection of nodal and metastatic disease in prostate cancer. However, their use implies an increase in diagnostic costs compared to conventional imaging (CI) tests such as CT and bone scan. The aim of our study was to determine which diagnostic pathway is more cost-effective in high-risk prostate cancer.
Material And Method:
Cost-effectiveness analysis of the available imaging tests (CI, Choline/PSMA PET) for the staging of high-risk prostate cancer. Sensitivity and specificity were estimated based on published evidence, and costs were collected from the Management Department. In order to carry out a cost-effectiveness analysis, five diagnostic pathways were proposed estimating the accurate diagnoses.
Results:
PSMA PET was the most accurate diagnostic option. The CI diagnostic workup was the most economical and CI+PSMA the most expensive. Analyzing the diagnostic cost-effectiveness ratio, CI+PSMA proved to be the most expensive (€5627.30 per correct diagnosis) followed by PET PSMA (€4987.11), choline (€4599.84) and CI (€4444.22).
Conclusions:
PSMA PET is the most accurate strategy in staging distant disease in patients with high-risk prostate cancer. Radiotracer uptake tests such as CI have been shown to be the most cost-effective option, followed by choline and PSMA.
