Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2025
Photoselective Vaporesection of the Prostate via an End-firing Lithium Triborate Crystal Laser
Published on: May 9, 2018
Will Aquablation Be the New Benchmark for Robotic Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment for Benign Prostatic
Carlotta Nedbal1, Daniele Castellani2, Virgilio De Stefano2
1Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy; Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.
Background And Objective:
Aquablation is included in the European Association Urology guidelines as an alternative surgical technique for prostate resection. The evidence summary states that it is subjectively and objectively as effective as transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and enucleation, but concerns remain regarding postoperative bleeding. Our aim was to provide an evidence-based overview of the trials, triumphs, and technical challenges of Aquablation.
Methods:
A literature search in the PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases was performed to identify clinical prospective and retrospective studies and reviews on Aquablation. A total of 54 reports were included. A narrative review of current evidence and an overview of the surgical technique are provided.
Key Findings And Limitations:
Aquablation demonstrates excellent short- and long-term functional outcomes, with a good safety profile comparable to that of TURP. The procedure is efficient and safe, even for very large prostates, with sustained improvements in functional outcomes well maintained up to 5 yr. The unique ability to conduct robotically controlled precise ablation of enlarged tissue while maintaining the sphincter makes Aquablation a very good ejaculation-sparing BPH treatment option. Initial issues with hemostasis have been successfully overcome with the use of gentle bladder-neck cautery after the procedure, allowing for early catheter removal. The above features make Aquablation an attractive minimally invasive technique and show that it is noninferior to holmium laser enucleation.
Conclusions And Clinical Implications:
Aquablation is a valid alternative to standard resection techniques, showing excellent long-term functional outcomes, good preservation of sexual function, a good safety profile, and good compliance for all prostate sizes and patient ages. Aquablation is still performed in high-volume centers, but the results can easily be emulated in other centers worldwide.
Advancing Practice:
Our review indicates that if Aquablation outcomes are emulated globally, this technique could easily become a new benchmark in robotic treatment for BPH.
Patient Summary:
Aquablation is a safe and effective surgical technique for treatment for benign enlargement of the prostate, with excellent medium-term outcomes. Although long-term studies are needed, the results are promising and challenge the current surgical and laser techniques used to reduce the size of the prostate gland.
