Exploring sex variations in the incidence of cardiovascular events: a counterfactual decomposition analysis

Sara Castel-Feced1,2,3, Sara Malo1,2,3,4, Isabel Aguilar-Palacio1,2,3,4

  • 1Department of Microbiology, Pediatrics, Radiology, and Public Health, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.

PubMed

Insights

Diabetes and socioeconomic status significantly contribute to sex differences in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Targeted diabetes prevention for men and gender-equal policies can help reduce this MACE gap.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular health
  • Health inequalities
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs) exhibit sex-specific prevalence, influencing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).
  • Social determinants of health significantly impact MACE development and contribute to health disparities.
  • Counterfactual decomposition analysis offers a novel method to analyze health inequalities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate sex-based differences in MACE incidence.
  • To quantify the contribution of diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, and socioeconomic status (SES) to observed sex disparities in MACE.

Main Methods:

  • Employed descriptive and counterfactual analyses on a cohort of 278,515 individuals with CVRFs.
  • Estimated causal factor contributions by comparing observed risk ratios with hypothetical scenarios where men shared women's factor distributions.
  • Data collected between 2018 and 2021.

Main Results:

  • Hypercholesterolaemia was the most common CVRF, with similar prevalence in both sexes; diabetes was more prevalent in men.
  • Men exhibited a higher incidence of MACE compared to women.
  • Diabetes and socioeconomic status (SES) were identified as primary mediators of sex differences in MACE, with SES having an offsetting effect.

Conclusions:

  • Addressing the MACE disparity requires focused diabetes prevention strategies for men.
  • Implementing gender-equal salary policies is recommended to mitigate socioeconomic disparities contributing to the MACE gap.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
170
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
280
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
129
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
177
Variability: Analysis01:11

Variability: Analysis

Measures of variability are statistical metrics that reveal the dispersion pattern within a dataset. They are pivotal in biostatistics, providing insights into the heterogeneity within health and biological data. Variability signifies the degree to which data points diverge from one another, helping researchers understand the potential range of values and associated uncertainty within the data.
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
143
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
133